From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maximilian attems Subject: Re: [patch-kj] remove old ifdef'd code from Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:19:33 +0200 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040622141933.GA1558@sputnik.stro.at> References: <20040621182918.GX1545@sputnik.stro.at> <20040621183140.GA22588@infradead.org> <20040622084440.GB1531@sputnik.stro.at> <20040622084714.GA31811@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from baikonur.stro.at ([213.239.196.228]:42915 "EHLO baikonur.stro.at") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264061AbUFVOTa (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jun 2004 10:19:30 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040622084714.GA31811@infradead.org> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: garloff@suse.de, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 10:44:40AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > > While the changes are okay, this driver is beeing changed rapidly and I > > > have a patch pending that's a supertset of yours. So please don't apply > > > James. > > > > are you referring to the dc390 driver patches? > > Yes. ok i'll drop that. > > what about the aic7xxx and the aic79xx? > > There have been rumors on linux-scsi that adaptec is starting to maintain > them again. OTOH they'll need to redo their patches in small steps anyway > so your patches look fine to me. thanks for the review, so i'll sent them to andrew. a++ maks