Re: PATCH: BLIST flag for non-lockable devices

[Javier Marcet <javier@marcet.info>]

* Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> [040625 18:14]:

>> Since SCSI already has the device list it would seem like we would
>> possibly add a new flag like was done for mode sense. As this is not a
>> transport issue I would assume we would not want to add flags in
>> usb/storage, but handle it in the mid-layer as a SCSI protocol
>> non-compliance.

>Here is a patch that implements this suggestion.  It's rather similar to 
>the one that Javier Marcet wrote back in January, in

>http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-users&m=107345268526718&w=2

>Matthew, does this patch work for your digital camera?

For me, as you probably guessed, this is fine. It works very well with
my iRiver.

Yet I wonder why the INQUIRY_36 flag? Isn't it the default? Or you just
try to skip the try & failure over longer inquiries since you already
know these devices' length?

No complaints no my side anyway. Push it upstream when you see it fit :)


-- 
The entire CHINESE WOMEN'S VOLLEYBALL TEAM all share ONE personality --
and have since BIRTH!!

Javier Marcet <javier@marcet.info>