From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: PATCH: Further aacraid work Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:42:07 -0400 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040629204207.GA22990@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <547AF3BD0F3F0B4CBDC379BAC7E4189FF1D6D0@otce2k03.adaptec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:58524 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266038AbUF2Umg (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:42:36 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <547AF3BD0F3F0B4CBDC379BAC7E4189FF1D6D0@otce2k03.adaptec.com> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "Salyzyn, Mark" Cc: Byron Stanoszek , Mark Haverkamp , Alan Cox , linux-kernel , linux-scsi On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 03:27:54PM -0400, Salyzyn, Mark wrote: > Although I am gratified that 1.1.5-2345 works, and works well (*many* > performance improvements have occurred in this driver, but some of those > have reached Alan's patch), I am at a loss because I was sure that the I'll have a look what from my tree isnt in Linus tree and what from 2345 isn't in my tree if you give me a pointer to the current tree you have and see if I can spot anything