From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: bytes/CDB of SCSI pass thru grossly limited maybe Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 16:12:40 +0200 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040731141240.GE23697@suse.de> References: <1091228652.6845.1.camel@patibmrh9> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:21696 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267956AbUGaOND (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Jul 2004 10:13:03 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1091228652.6845.1.camel@patibmrh9> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Pat LaVarre Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 30 2004, Pat LaVarre wrote: > Offline a friend reports seeing bytes/CDB of Linux ioctl SG_IO grossly > limited - like down below 0.000000128 GB/CDB for op x3B "WRITE BUFFER". Could you have chosen a more awkward way to express that number? I can't even make sense of it if I try, 0.128 bytes/cdb?! And are you talking about the length of the cdb, or do you mean the data that it can send/receive? I'd guess the latter, but then cdb isn't the correct term. So in short, please try again :-) -- Jens Axboe