* fwd: 2.4.27rc2, DVD-RW support broke DVD-RAM writes
[not found] ` <20040731163334.GH23697@suse.de>
@ 2004-08-01 14:17 ` Pat LaVarre
[not found] ` <06E9D950-E3EF-11D8-B976-00039398BB5E@ieee.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pat LaVarre @ 2004-08-01 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
>> With 2.4.27rc2 (and I assume anything later than pre5 - that's when
>> DVD-RW got added) DVD-RAMs have become read-only. Opening a DVD-RAM
>> for
>> writing results in "EROFS (Read-only file system)" (reported by
>> 'strace'.
...
> let Pat fix it. Pat?
I'll work first to duplicate this result, then try to fix it, maybe by
deleting all set_disk_ro.
I'll look for code that ends up rewriting both DVD-RAM and Iomega REV
discs.
> Also, any chance we get proper 'DVD-RAM is write-protected' support in
> 2.4.x ? It'd be really nice if write()/open(O_WRONLY) would fail in
> those cases.
I'll try Iomega REV discs with the MMC PWP switch flipped on and off.
> ...
Please redirect me if need be.
Pat LaVarre
http://linux-pel.blog-city.com/read/754579.htm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [usb-storage] 2.4.27rc2, DVD-RW support broke DVD-RAM writes
[not found] ` <70B2077E-E401-11D8-B976-00039398BB5E@ieee.org>
@ 2004-08-01 23:53 ` Matthew Dharm
2004-08-02 8:07 ` Jens Axboe
2004-08-16 17:07 ` Pat LaVarre
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Dharm @ 2004-08-01 23:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pat LaVarre
Cc: Jens Axboe, linux-scsi, usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net list
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1126 bytes --]
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 03:26:24PM -0600, Pat LaVarre wrote:
> Jens A/ Matt D:
>
> Linux 2.4.27-rc4 and 2.4.26 do Not recognise USB DVD-RAM disc
> rewritability, even though 2.4.27 has recognised USB Iomega REV disc
> rewritability at least since -rc3.
>
> Q0: Agreed?
I'll take your word for it.
> Q1: Would you consider a promptly written patch to persuade 2.4.27-rc4
> to recognise USB DVD-RAM rewritability? Or is 2.4 development already
> too over?
I've turned over 2.4 maintance to Pete Zaitcev.
> Q2: Where do you want the patch? In drivers/usb? In drivers/scsi?
To me, it sounds like drivers/scsi would be better. Tho I can see good
arguments for either location.
> Q3: What patch do you want? Should we try op x5A after op x1A fails?
> Or should we try only op x5A? Or should we try op x5A first?
I would think on a SCSI Level 2 device, we should start with x5A.
Matt
--
Matthew Dharm Home: mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net
Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver
It was a new hope.
-- Dust Puppy
User Friendly, 12/25/1998
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [usb-storage] 2.4.27rc2, DVD-RW support broke DVD-RAM writes
2004-08-01 23:53 ` [usb-storage] " Matthew Dharm
@ 2004-08-02 8:07 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2004-08-02 8:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pat LaVarre, linux-scsi,
usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net list
On Sun, Aug 01 2004, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 03:26:24PM -0600, Pat LaVarre wrote:
> > Jens A/ Matt D:
> >
> > Linux 2.4.27-rc4 and 2.4.26 do Not recognise USB DVD-RAM disc
> > rewritability, even though 2.4.27 has recognised USB Iomega REV disc
> > rewritability at least since -rc3.
> >
> > Q0: Agreed?
>
> I'll take your word for it.
>
> > Q1: Would you consider a promptly written patch to persuade 2.4.27-rc4
> > to recognise USB DVD-RAM rewritability? Or is 2.4 development already
> > too over?
>
> I've turned over 2.4 maintance to Pete Zaitcev.
I think this was a general question. If the patch is to go into
2.4.27-rc now, then it has to be to the point and straight forward (aka
obviously correct). Otherwise we back it out, and get it fixed for
2.4.28-rc.
> > Q2: Where do you want the patch? In drivers/usb? In drivers/scsi?
>
> To me, it sounds like drivers/scsi would be better. Tho I can see good
> arguments for either location.
Agree
> > Q3: What patch do you want? Should we try op x5A after op x1A fails?
> > Or should we try only op x5A? Or should we try op x5A first?
>
> I would think on a SCSI Level 2 device, we should start with x5A.
Agree. But such a change alone means that it cannot go into 2.4.27, it
has to be in 2.4.28-pre.
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [usb-storage] 2.4.27rc2, DVD-RW support broke DVD-RAM writes
[not found] ` <70B2077E-E401-11D8-B976-00039398BB5E@ieee.org>
2004-08-01 23:53 ` [usb-storage] " Matthew Dharm
@ 2004-08-16 17:07 ` Pat LaVarre
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pat LaVarre @ 2004-08-16 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: usb-storage; +Cc: linux-scsi
> drivers/scsi/sr.c ... vendor-specific op x1A
> reaching the drive, by analogy with SPC op x1A "MODE SENSE (6)", in
> place of the standard MMC op x5A "MODE SENSE (10)" ...
I've now concretely proposed fixing this in drivers/scsi/.
Subject: [PATCH 2.4] rewritable USB DVD-RAM vs. mode sense op choice
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=109267404822826
Of course I'll return to drivers/usb/storage/ if the drivers/scsi/ folk
say I should.
Pat LaVarre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-08-16 17:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20040730153657.GB2748@logos.cnet>
[not found] ` <20040731163334.GH23697@suse. de>
[not found] ` <20040731163334.GH23697@suse.de>
2004-08-01 14:17 ` fwd: 2.4.27rc2, DVD-RW support broke DVD-RAM writes Pat LaVarre
[not found] ` <06E9D950-E3EF-11D8-B976-00039398BB5E@ieee.org>
[not found] ` <70B2077E-E401-11D8-B976-00039398BB5E@ieee.org>
2004-08-01 23:53 ` [usb-storage] " Matthew Dharm
2004-08-02 8:07 ` Jens Axboe
2004-08-16 17:07 ` Pat LaVarre
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).