From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Pat LaVarre <p.lavarre@ieee.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bytes/CDB of SCSI pass thru grossly limited maybe
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 19:08:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040823170827.GC24089@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D36722F-F51E-11D8-BFA2-00039398BB5E@ieee.org>
On Mon, Aug 23 2004, Pat LaVarre wrote:
> Jens A:
>
> >>Is there an ide-cd option to allow more bytes/CDB?
> >...
> >ATAPI cannot do more than 128KiB per command. And
> >that is what q->max_sectors is set to, if you try and submit more than
> >this through SG_IO, bio_add_user() will complain and command will be
> >failed as you experienced.
>
> Wow.
>
> Please reply to confirm - you are saying 128 KiB data bytes per command
> is a Linux PATAPI design limit?
>
> I know even twelve-byte-packet PATAPI itself as defined at t13.org and
> t10.org can do xFFFF = (64 Ki - 1) LBA's via such ten-byte per CDB ops
> as x28 "READ (10)" and x2A "WRITE (10)". At 2 KiB/LBA, that's 128 MiB
> minus 2 KiB. That's the kind of limit I expected, when instead in
> Linux I saw limits like 120 KiB in SCSI over USB. Also I hear
> sixteen-byte-packet PATAPI can itself pass xFFFF:FFFF data blocks per
> command.
What you can shove into the cdb is of lesser interest than the fact that
ATAPI itself cannot do more than 128KiB _per command_.
> In parallel, I'll click thru to bio_add_user to read the limits there.
There are no extra limits there, it's just in the queue itself
(max_sectors, segments, etc).
> >As I'm sure you know,
>
> I didn't know, thank you, sorry I have no clue, I'm not trying to
> pretend I do, I got into this at the request of a friend who needs 256
> KiB data per command.
??? You must have some clue on the actual hardware, if you have been
working on the hardware side for many years :-)
> I specifically have Not yet tried patching the Linux kernel to persuade
> PATAPI to allow more data bytes per command. I did try USB. So far
> I've failed. At:
>
> Subject: [usb-storage] faq max_sectors
> https://lists.one-eyed-alien.net/pipermail/usb-storage/2004-August/
> 000680.html
>
> I have reported that raising SCSI_DEFAULT_MAX_SECTORS alone does not
> actually allow more data bytes per command in USB.
Ok, let me try to explain. There are several factors that limit how big
a command you can send to a device - some of these are hardware, some of
these are just imposed by the driver. If you look inside the
request_queue structure in blkdev.h, you'll find such things as:
unsigned short max_sectors;
unsigned short max_phys_segments;
unsigned short max_hw_segments;
unsigned int max_segment_size;
which are set by the driver and limit how big a request you can submit
through SG_IO.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-23 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-30 23:04 bytes/CDB of SCSI pass thru grossly limited maybe Pat LaVarre
2004-07-31 14:12 ` Jens Axboe
2004-08-16 17:55 ` Pat LaVarre
2004-08-17 18:07 ` Pat LaVarre
2004-08-23 15:46 ` Jens Axboe
2004-08-23 16:05 ` Pat LaVarre
2004-08-23 17:08 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2004-08-23 17:28 ` Pat LaVarre
2004-08-23 18:17 ` Jens Axboe
2004-08-26 23:20 ` Pat LaVarre
2004-08-23 16:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-08-23 17:05 ` Pat LaVarre
2004-08-23 18:48 ` Luben Tuikov
2004-08-23 19:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-08-23 19:14 ` Luben Tuikov
[not found] <A8E06BE4-F7BA-11D8-AC6B-00039398BB5E@ieee.org>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44L0 .0408271100590.1238-100000@ida.rowland.org>
2004-08-27 15:09 ` Alan Stern
2004-08-28 14:31 ` Jens Axboe
2004-08-28 15:14 ` Alan Stern
2004-08-28 15:36 ` Jens Axboe
2004-08-28 17:51 ` James Bottomley
2004-08-28 17:55 ` Jens Axboe
2004-08-28 18:20 ` James Bottomley
2004-08-28 18:41 ` Jens Axboe
2004-08-29 13:34 ` James Bottomley
2004-08-29 13:45 ` Jens Axboe
2004-08-30 18:15 ` Pat LaVarre
2004-09-01 15:20 ` Pat LaVarre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040823170827.GC24089@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=p.lavarre@ieee.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).