From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Moore, Eric Dean" <Emoore@lsil.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Masao Fukuchi <fukuchi.masao@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix dma mapping leak in fusion
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 21:02:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040828190256.GA17846@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0E3FA95632D6D047BA649F95DAB60E5704DE6BD5@exa-atlanta>
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 11:56:50AM -0400, Moore, Eric Dean wrote:
> Christoph - What is the criteria for the mid-layer
> to offline a device?
When eh_abort didn't succeed for all outstanding commands and the various
reset methods failed aswell.
> The dmesg dump in previous email indicates that mid-layer
> issued several aborts to the LLD, then mpt driver is returning
> SUCCESS. However at some point the midlayer offlines the device,
> however commands are still in the LLD, and completed sometime later after
> the mptscsih_taskmgmt_timeout is called, thus hitting the
> oops(because request_buffer=NULL), as we have removed the
> scsi_device_online check per your request.
I'm looking over fusion code with your latest patch applied now. What
worries me is mptscsih_flush_running_cmds where's you're erroring out
commands possibly from withing EH methods (?, I have a hard time
following the code from mptscsih to mptbase and back), but not under
EH control.
Btw, when looking over this it seems to me you could kill
mptscsih_search_running_cmds - the scsi core makes sure you'll never
have outstanding commands when it calls ->slave_destory.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-28 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-23 15:56 [PATCH] fix dma mapping leak in fusion Moore, Eric Dean
2004-08-28 19:02 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-31 14:42 Moore, Eric Dean
2004-08-30 22:29 Moore, Eric Dean
2004-08-31 12:56 ` Luben Tuikov
2004-08-31 13:14 ` Luben Tuikov
2004-08-20 15:01 Moore, Eric Dean
2004-08-23 1:41 ` Masao Fukuchi
2004-08-19 14:47 Moore, Eric Dean
2004-08-20 3:05 ` Masao Fukuchi
2004-08-17 16:42 Moore, Eric Dean
2004-08-17 16:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-17 17:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-17 18:18 ` Luben Tuikov
2004-08-17 16:16 Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-19 3:01 ` Masao Fukuchi
2004-08-19 10:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-19 13:14 ` Masao Fukuchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040828190256.GA17846@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=Emoore@lsil.com \
--cc=fukuchi.masao@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).