From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [linux-iscsi-devel] Re: [PATCH RFC] replace ioctl for sysfs take 2 Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 17:33:36 +0100 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040906163336.GE642@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <413557CB.8010008@cs.wisc.edu> <20040901162042.GC26753@null.msp.redhat.com> <20040906143251.GB21646@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:63687 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268136AbUIFQdh (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Sep 2004 12:33:37 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040906143251.GB21646@lst.de> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Mike Christie , iscsi -devel , David Wysochanski , "Surekha.PC" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 04:32:51PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 11:20:42AM -0500, AJ Lewis wrote: > > Do we want all these attributes in the scsi_host class, or should we put them > > in the iscsi devices directory? So in /sys/bus/iscsi-sfnet/devices/iscsi1 - Woah, woah, woah. What's this "iscsi-sfnet" directory in sysfs? That's just wrong. No way is that crap going into the kernel. We have to have *one* iscsi infrastructure, not a dozen. -- "Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain