From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] New QStor SATA/RAID Driver for 2.6.9-rc2 Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 14:08:05 -0400 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040914180805.GA20760@havoc.gtf.org> References: <41471163.10709@rtr.ca> <414723B0.1090600@pobox.com> <41472FA0.2090108@rtr.ca> <414730D9.3000003@pobox.com> <41473270.3070405@rtr.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from [69.28.190.101] ([69.28.190.101]:41694 "EHLO havoc.gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269607AbUINSIG (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Sep 2004 14:08:06 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41473270.3070405@rtr.ca> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Lord Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, SCSI Mailing List , James Bottomley On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 02:03:28PM -0400, Mark Lord wrote: > It looks to me as if the eh code prevents further queuecommand() > calls while the LLD *_reset_handler() code is running. > I wonder if it also does so for the eh_strategy_handler() ? Yes, it definitely does, by definition: SCSI's fine-grained eh hooks are called inside scsi_unjam_host(), which is the default ->eh_strategy_handler. Jeff