From: Mark Overmeer <Mark@Overmeer.net>
To: Stas Nikiforov <stas@itam.nsc.ru>
Cc: Linux-scsi list <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
rocks_list <npaci-rocks-discussion@sdsc.edu>
Subject: Re: Huge 1.2TB partition
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 10:01:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040925100108.A7908@speeltuin.ATComputing.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1096019417.2726.61.camel@whirl.lab7.lan>; from stas@itam.nsc.ru on Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 04:50:17PM +0700
* Stas Nikiforov (stas@itam.nsc.ru) [040924 11:50]:
> I have RAID 5 6x250 SATA storage.
> Is it a good idea to have one huge partition
> or it is better to split it on smaller logical drives and then use LVM,
> for example?
>
> In any way, what is a preferred filesystem for this storage?
> I plan to use it as a mass storage for CFD results.
I run a disk-set of 4x250 SATA with an Adaptec 2410SA and
a disk-set of 8x250 SATA with an Adaptec 2810SA.
In both cases, I have a small disk aside, which I use for the OS, log-
files and such. The array is dedicated to my data: satellite images.
Usually, having one partition is best, certainly with a file-system
which is tuned on large disk-sets. I choose XFS, which is capable of
handing much larger partitions. It runs currently on SuSE9.0 with
recent 2.6 kernels.
My selection is not based on performance tests: the I/O bandwidth of
the PCI-bus is my bottleneck. But in my case counts: as long as it
is faster than a tape-archive..... and cheap
--
MarkOv
------------------------------------------------------------------------
drs Mark A.C.J. Overmeer MARKOV Solutions
Mark@Overmeer.net solutions@overmeer.net
http://Mark.Overmeer.net http://solutions.overmeer.net
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-25 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-24 9:50 Huge 1.2TB partition Stas Nikiforov
2004-09-24 15:45 ` [Rocks-Discuss]Huge " Joe Landman
2004-09-24 16:04 ` David
2004-09-25 8:01 ` Mark Overmeer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040925100108.A7908@speeltuin.ATComputing.nl \
--to=mark@overmeer.net \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npaci-rocks-discussion@sdsc.edu \
--cc=stas@itam.nsc.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox