From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Willy Tarreau Subject: Re: patch so cciss stats are collected in /proc/stat Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:21:46 +0200 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20041001052146.GD721@alpha.home.local> References: <1096476186.2786.45.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> <415AE9CF.40008@xss.co.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from willy.net1.nerim.net ([62.212.114.60]:43793 "EHLO willy.net1.nerim.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269699AbUJAFYv (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Oct 2004 01:24:51 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <415AE9CF.40008@xss.co.at> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Andreas Haumer Cc: arjanv@redhat.com, "Miller, Mike (OS Dev)" , Christoph Hellwig , mikem@beardog.cca.cpqcorp.net, marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, "Baker, Brian (ISS - Houston)" On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 06:58:55PM +0200, Andreas Haumer wrote: > The majority of _our_ customers are using 2.4.x kernels > (x beeing in the range from 19 to 28pre3) and it looks like > it will stay that for quite a while... I second this. The only one of our customers who tried 2.6 went back to 2.4 because of poor network performance, scheduling problems and stability issues. > PS: I know this is somewhat off topic, but I just want to raise > my voice if I get the impression kernel developers forget about > the "real world outside". I will shut up in a moment! Thank you! Very true. You just have to read any 2.6 changelog to understand that it *is* a development kernel ! The difference between 2.5 and 2.6 is that the test platform now is larger and includes production systems. Willy