From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Willy Tarreau Subject: Re: patch so cciss stats are collected in /proc/stat Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:33:01 +0200 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20041001053301.GE721@alpha.home.local> References: <1096476186.2786.45.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from willy.net1.nerim.net ([62.212.114.60]:45585 "EHLO willy.net1.nerim.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269704AbUJAFf7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Oct 2004 01:35:59 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1096476186.2786.45.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: "Miller, Mike (OS Dev)" , Christoph Hellwig , mikem@beardog.cca.cpqcorp.net, marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, "Baker, Brian (ISS - Houston)" On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 06:43:06PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > I doubt you have many customers using 2.4.28.... I suspect that by now > the majority of people is either using an (ancient) 2.4 vendor kernel or > a 2.6 kernel. The very low number of reports on lkml about 2.4 seems to > confirm that ... You must be kidding, aren't you ? I would better say that the very high number of reports on lkml about 2.6 seems to confirm that 2.6 still is a toy ! Marcelo has done a great job at getting 2.4 stable, and now people are installing it in remote locations or embedded system with no planned updated at all. And it works. Just like people did with 2.0 recently. This may be why there are so few reports. Willy