From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: Canonical SCSI messages Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 21:15:45 +0100 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20041001201545.GL16153@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <20041001165324.GE16153@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20041001173054.GA1363@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:2246 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266376AbUJAUPt (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:15:49 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041001173054.GA1363@us.ibm.com> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Wilcox , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 10:30:54AM -0700, Mike Anderson wrote: > There has been a lot of debate on consistent message formats in the > past. I have not tracked this in a while. The previous patch was based > on what I thought was a common API all where trying to use (i.e., > dev_printk) I think the thing is that there are really two devices that "represent" the card. There's one for its PCI device and one for its SCSI host. You plumped for the former, while I think the latter makes more sense. > It does not seem that hard to run lsscsi --hosts. That's a really good point. Thanks. -- "Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain