From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Gibbons, Terry" <Terry.Gibbons@lsil.com>
Cc: "'arjanv@redhat.com'" <arjanv@redhat.com>,
'James Bottomley' <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
"Moore, Eric Dean" <Emoore@lsil.com>,
"Stephens, Larry" <larry.stephens@lsil.com>,
"Shirron, Stephen" <Stephen.Shirron@lsil.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fusion: streamline ->queuecommand
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 16:30:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041006143002.GA27262@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BC3CE0375D29D51199A400508B66CA6C0862AEFE@exc-snake.co.lsil.com>
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 08:23:23AM -0600, Gibbons, Terry wrote:
> I stand corrected. Our customers will force driver patches through Red Hat
> and SuSE. They buy these products and keep Linux distributors in business.
> Do you expect our customers to take huge hits to their bottom line because
> DV will no longer execute properly on LSI devices?
You're totally missing the point. No one wants to remove DV
functionality. We want a single implementation of the DV mechanism in
the SPI transport class instead of various buggy copies in individual
drivers.
No may I kindly suggest that you stop trolling on this list and let your
staff handle this issue. I'm pretty sure we can work out a solution
that suits everyone with Eric if we get the nonsensical managment issues
out of the loop.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-06 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-06 14:23 [PATCH] fusion: streamline ->queuecommand Gibbons, Terry
2004-10-06 14:30 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2004-10-06 15:47 ` James Bottomley
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-21 14:58 Moore, Eric Dean
2004-10-06 14:46 Gibbons, Terry
2004-10-06 14:58 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-06 14:00 Gibbons, Terry
2004-10-06 14:13 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-10-06 14:25 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-05 22:38 Moore, Eric Dean
2004-10-05 23:11 ` James Bottomley
2004-10-05 23:37 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-10-06 0:48 ` James Bottomley
2004-10-04 21:33 Moore, Eric Dean
2004-10-04 21:57 ` James Bottomley
2004-10-06 15:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-02 8:13 Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-02 13:39 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-02 14:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-21 9:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041006143002.GA27262@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=Emoore@lsil.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=Stephen.Shirron@lsil.com \
--cc=Terry.Gibbons@lsil.com \
--cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=larry.stephens@lsil.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).