From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Lan Tran <transter@gmail.com>
Cc: Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, johntsai@us.ibm.com,
tranlan@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: BUG: SCSI INQUIRY thru SCSI_IOCTL_SEND_COMMAND returns no errno for disconnected device
Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 08:35:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041009063538.GA12179@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac71172a04100816436c59c5c3@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Oct 08 2004, Lan Tran wrote:
> Thanks Patrick for the tip! After trying out SG_IO, it works, as long
> as we use Mike C's patch.
>
> Lan
>
> On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:31:31 -0700, Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 12:43:47PM -0700, Lan Tran wrote:
> > > We have a SAN system set up, where our host is connected to IBM ESS
> > > storage and SVC storage. When we disconnect ALL FC cables between the
> > > host and storage devices, and then send a SCSI INQUIRY using the
> > > SCSI_IOCTL_SEND_COMMAND ioctl to the
> > > sd devices, the ioctl does not return with a failure code. Instead, it
> > > returns with a zero-length buffer.
> > >
> > > Is there a reason why we would get a zeroed-length buffer instead of
> > > an error return code?
> >
> > SCSI_IOCTL_SEND_COMMAND is deprecated, you should be using SG_IO instead.
> >
> > There was a bug with SG_IO, it does not correctly set all of the status
> > bytes, a patch has been submitted a few times, Mike C's patch
> > fixed problems compared to ones I posted earlier, this patch:
> >
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=108617935710955&w=2
> >
> > It looks like SCSI_IOCTL_SEND_COMMAND has a similiar issue, in that it
> > only checks the low byte of the results, so for example a DID_NO_CONNECT
> > returned by the qlogic or emulex driver would be ignored.
> >
> > See drivers/block/scsi_ioctl.c near the end of sg_scsi_ioctl, this:
> >
> > err = rq->errors & 0xff; /* only 8 bit SCSI status */
> >
> > Compare that to code in drivers/scsi/scsi_ioctl.c near the end of
> > scsi_ioctl_send_command, where the entire result is checked, not just the
> > SCSI byte.
I'll make sure to get that patch finally in. It made it to the bsg tree,
and never further. Thanks for the reminder.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-09 6:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-30 19:43 BUG: SCSI INQUIRY thru SCSI_IOCTL_SEND_COMMAND returns no errno for disconnected device Lan Tran
2004-10-01 16:31 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-10-08 23:43 ` Lan Tran
2004-10-09 6:35 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041009063538.GA12179@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=johntsai@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patmans@us.ibm.com \
--cc=tranlan@us.ibm.com \
--cc=transter@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).