From: Mike Anderson <andmike@us.ibm.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
SCSI development list <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: CD driver sends command during host removal
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 13:40:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041011204050.GD8296@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1097525576.2031.173.camel@mulgrave>
James Bottomley [James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com] wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 15:03, Alan Stern wrote:
> > The problem arises when a command completes. In the notified ejection
> > case, if the LLD tries to call the scsi_done routine for a completed
> > command which was submitted before scsi_remove_host and which the SCSI
> > core has already cleaned up, it will cause an oops. Since the LLD has no
> > way to tell whether the core has cleaned up a command or not, its only
> > choice is to fail _every_ command starting shortly before it calls
> > scsi_remove_host.
>
> This is the remove implies cancel issue that was discussed earlier. I
> thought the proposal was to have a remove that wouldn't automatically
> cancel all the commands? ... although I don't think I've seen any code
> for that case yet.
>
Clarification. James, are you indicating that there needs to be a new
scsi mid api that performs similar function to scsi_remove_host expect
does not cancel commands?
If is unclear to me if a LLDD provides a slave_destroy which is called
from scsi_remove_device during the scsi_forget_host function that we
would hit a case where the LLDD has good IO to complete still
outstanding when we complete scsi_forget_host and call scsi_host_cancel.
Is there some locking / synchronization issue with our state changes and
the scsi_prep_fn / scsi_request_fn / scsi_dispatch_cmd sequence?
-andmike
--
Michael Anderson
andmike@us.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-11 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-11 19:20 BUG: CD driver sends command during host removal Alan Stern
2004-10-11 19:36 ` James Bottomley
2004-10-11 20:03 ` Alan Stern
2004-10-11 20:12 ` James Bottomley
2004-10-11 20:40 ` Mike Anderson [this message]
2004-10-11 21:15 ` James Bottomley
2004-10-11 23:13 ` Mike Anderson
[not found] <20040926082926.GA1944@uniball>
2004-09-27 18:18 ` Alan Stern
2004-09-27 18:51 ` Mohammed Sameer
2004-09-29 16:06 ` Luben Tuikov
2004-09-29 16:55 ` Alan Stern
2004-09-29 17:09 ` Mike Anderson
2004-09-29 18:02 ` Luben Tuikov
2004-09-29 18:09 ` James Bottomley
2004-09-29 18:58 ` Luben Tuikov
2004-09-29 19:39 ` James Bottomley
2004-09-29 19:01 ` Alan Stern
2004-09-29 19:27 ` Mike Anderson
2004-09-29 19:33 ` Luben Tuikov
2004-09-29 19:50 ` James Bottomley
2004-09-29 20:31 ` Mike Anderson
2004-09-29 20:41 ` James Bottomley
2004-09-29 21:07 ` Mike Anderson
2004-09-29 21:14 ` James Bottomley
2004-09-29 21:20 ` Luben Tuikov
2004-09-29 21:26 ` James Bottomley
2004-09-29 21:20 ` Alan Stern
2004-10-02 23:57 ` Mohammed Sameer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041011204050.GD8296@us.ibm.com \
--to=andmike@us.ibm.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).