From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "'Dave Olien'" Subject: Re: Question about Request Sense case in scsi_lib.c Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 15:09:07 -0700 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20041013220907.GB30273@osdl.org> References: <53CF1076699CD711B7DD0002A51363F1072A6E3A@exw-ks.ks.lsil.com> <20041013214629.GA30273@osdl.org> <1097704592.1714.266.camel@mulgrave> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:63393 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269875AbUJMWJN (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2004 18:09:13 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1097704592.1714.266.camel@mulgrave> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: "Qi, Yanling" , Douglas Gilbert , Tim Pepper , SCSI Mailing List Sure, I'll get on it right away. Dave On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 04:56:25PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 16:46, 'Dave Olien' wrote: > > Now, on to figuring out why some of these requeued commands > > fail the requeue. > > Yes, I've been wondering that too ... either the second remap is wrong, > or something goes awry with the segment recount on a requeue. > > In the unit attention, could you print out cmd->use_sg and > cmd->request->nr_phys_segments ... just to see what values got set up > the first time around, which might give a clue where to look for the > problem. > > James >