From: "'Dave Olien'" <dmo@osdl.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix for Incorrect number of segments after building list problem
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 14:55:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041014215543.GA32307@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1097790683.1717.47.camel@mulgrave>
OK, I'll apply it immediately and let you know what happens.
Dave
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 04:51:16PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> This is a rather nasty hack at the momen, but it seems to persuade
> blk_recalc_rq_segments() not to underestimate.
>
> Could you try it in your setup to see if it fixes the problem?
>
> Thanks,
>
> James
>
> ===== drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c 1.271 vs edited =====
> --- 1.271/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c 2004-09-13 19:23:21 -05:00
> +++ edited/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c 2004-10-14 16:24:38 -05:00
> @@ -921,7 +921,8 @@
> }
> new_segment:
> if (BIOVEC_VIRT_MERGEABLE(bvprv, bv) &&
> - !BIOVEC_VIRT_OVERSIZE(hw_seg_size + bv->bv_len)) {
> + !BIOVEC_VIRT_OVERSIZE(hw_seg_size + bv->bv_len) &&
> + hw_seg_size + bv->bv_len <= q->max_segment_size) {
> hw_seg_size += bv->bv_len;
> } else {
> new_hw_segment:
> @@ -2723,30 +2724,49 @@
> void blk_recalc_rq_segments(struct request *rq)
> {
> struct bio *bio, *prevbio = NULL;
> - int nr_phys_segs, nr_hw_segs;
> + int nr_phys_segs, nr_hw_segs, tot_phys_size = 0, tot_hw_size = 0;
>
> if (!rq->bio)
> return;
>
> nr_phys_segs = nr_hw_segs = 0;
> rq_for_each_bio(bio, rq) {
> + int bi_phys_segs, bi_hw_segs;
> /* Force bio hw/phys segs to be recalculated. */
> bio->bi_flags &= ~(1 << BIO_SEG_VALID);
>
> - nr_phys_segs += bio_phys_segments(rq->q, bio);
> - nr_hw_segs += bio_hw_segments(rq->q, bio);
> + bi_phys_segs = bio_phys_segments(rq->q, bio);
> + bi_hw_segs = bio_hw_segments(rq->q, bio);
> + nr_phys_segs += bi_phys_segs;
> + nr_hw_segs += bi_hw_segs;
> if (prevbio) {
> - if (blk_phys_contig_segment(rq->q, prevbio, bio))
> + if (blk_phys_contig_segment(rq->q, prevbio, bio) &&
> + bio->bi_size + tot_phys_size < rq->q->max_segment_size)
> nr_phys_segs--;
> - if (blk_hw_contig_segment(rq->q, prevbio, bio))
> + else
> + tot_phys_size = 0;
> + if (blk_hw_contig_segment(rq->q, prevbio, bio) &&
> + bio->bi_size + tot_hw_size < rq->q->max_segment_size)
> nr_hw_segs--;
> + else
> + tot_hw_size = 0;
> }
> + if (bi_phys_segs > 1)
> + tot_phys_size = bio->bi_size;
> + else
> + tot_phys_size += bio->bi_size;
> + if (bi_hw_segs > 1)
> + tot_hw_size = bio->bi_size;
> + else
> + tot_hw_size += bio->bi_size;
> +
> prevbio = bio;
> }
>
> rq->nr_phys_segments = nr_phys_segs;
> rq->nr_hw_segments = nr_hw_segs;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_recalc_rq_segments);
>
> void blk_recalc_rq_sectors(struct request *rq, int nsect)
> {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-14 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-14 21:51 [PATCH] fix for Incorrect number of segments after building list problem James Bottomley
2004-10-14 21:55 ` 'Dave Olien' [this message]
2004-10-14 22:15 ` 'Dave Olien'
2004-10-14 22:51 ` 'Dave Olien'
2004-10-20 14:39 ` Jens Axboe
2004-10-20 15:07 ` Jens Axboe
2004-10-20 15:50 ` James Bottomley
2004-10-20 15:58 ` Jens Axboe
2004-10-20 16:07 ` James Bottomley
2004-10-20 16:11 ` Jens Axboe
2004-10-20 17:45 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-20 17:47 ` Jens Axboe
2004-10-20 18:11 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-21 12:49 ` James Bottomley
2004-10-21 13:02 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041014215543.GA32307@osdl.org \
--to=dmo@osdl.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).