linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "'Dave Olien'" <dmo@osdl.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>,
	SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix for Incorrect number of segments after building list problem
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 14:55:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041014215543.GA32307@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1097790683.1717.47.camel@mulgrave>


OK, I'll apply it immediately and let you know what happens.

Dave

On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 04:51:16PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> This is a rather nasty hack at the momen, but it seems to persuade
> blk_recalc_rq_segments() not to underestimate.
> 
> Could you try it in your setup to see if it fixes the problem?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> James
> 
> ===== drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c 1.271 vs edited =====
> --- 1.271/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c	2004-09-13 19:23:21 -05:00
> +++ edited/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c	2004-10-14 16:24:38 -05:00
> @@ -921,7 +921,8 @@
>  		}
>  new_segment:
>  		if (BIOVEC_VIRT_MERGEABLE(bvprv, bv) &&
> -		    !BIOVEC_VIRT_OVERSIZE(hw_seg_size + bv->bv_len)) {
> +		    !BIOVEC_VIRT_OVERSIZE(hw_seg_size + bv->bv_len) &&
> +		    hw_seg_size + bv->bv_len <= q->max_segment_size) {
>  			hw_seg_size += bv->bv_len;
>  		} else {
>  new_hw_segment:
> @@ -2723,30 +2724,49 @@
>  void blk_recalc_rq_segments(struct request *rq)
>  {
>  	struct bio *bio, *prevbio = NULL;
> -	int nr_phys_segs, nr_hw_segs;
> +	int nr_phys_segs, nr_hw_segs, tot_phys_size = 0, tot_hw_size = 0;
>  
>  	if (!rq->bio)
>  		return;
>  
>  	nr_phys_segs = nr_hw_segs = 0;
>  	rq_for_each_bio(bio, rq) {
> +		int bi_phys_segs, bi_hw_segs;
>  		/* Force bio hw/phys segs to be recalculated. */
>  		bio->bi_flags &= ~(1 << BIO_SEG_VALID);
>  
> -		nr_phys_segs += bio_phys_segments(rq->q, bio);
> -		nr_hw_segs += bio_hw_segments(rq->q, bio);
> +		bi_phys_segs = bio_phys_segments(rq->q, bio);
> +		bi_hw_segs = bio_hw_segments(rq->q, bio);
> +		nr_phys_segs += bi_phys_segs;
> +		nr_hw_segs += bi_hw_segs;
>  		if (prevbio) {
> -			if (blk_phys_contig_segment(rq->q, prevbio, bio))
> +			if (blk_phys_contig_segment(rq->q, prevbio, bio) &&
> +			    bio->bi_size + tot_phys_size < rq->q->max_segment_size)
>  				nr_phys_segs--;
> -			if (blk_hw_contig_segment(rq->q, prevbio, bio))
> +			else
> +				tot_phys_size = 0;
> +			if (blk_hw_contig_segment(rq->q, prevbio, bio) &&
> +			    bio->bi_size + tot_hw_size < rq->q->max_segment_size)
>  				nr_hw_segs--;
> +			else
> +				tot_hw_size = 0;
>  		}
> +		if (bi_phys_segs > 1)
> +			tot_phys_size = bio->bi_size;
> +		else
> +			tot_phys_size += bio->bi_size;
> +		if (bi_hw_segs > 1)
> +			tot_hw_size = bio->bi_size;
> +		else
> +			tot_hw_size += bio->bi_size;
> +
>  		prevbio = bio;
>  	}
>  
>  	rq->nr_phys_segments = nr_phys_segs;
>  	rq->nr_hw_segments = nr_hw_segs;
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_recalc_rq_segments);
>  
>  void blk_recalc_rq_sectors(struct request *rq, int nsect)
>  {

  reply	other threads:[~2004-10-14 21:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-14 21:51 [PATCH] fix for Incorrect number of segments after building list problem James Bottomley
2004-10-14 21:55 ` 'Dave Olien' [this message]
2004-10-14 22:15 ` 'Dave Olien'
2004-10-14 22:51   ` 'Dave Olien'
2004-10-20 14:39 ` Jens Axboe
2004-10-20 15:07   ` Jens Axboe
2004-10-20 15:50     ` James Bottomley
2004-10-20 15:58       ` Jens Axboe
2004-10-20 16:07         ` James Bottomley
2004-10-20 16:11           ` Jens Axboe
2004-10-20 17:45           ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-20 17:47             ` Jens Axboe
2004-10-20 18:11               ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-21 12:49               ` James Bottomley
2004-10-21 13:02                 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041014215543.GA32307@osdl.org \
    --to=dmo@osdl.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).