From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
To: Douglas Gilbert <dougg@torque.net>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
hch@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi_debug [was: scsi_debug issues]
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 16:23:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041018232352.GA4747@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41743E41.8020707@torque.net>
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 08:05:53AM +1000, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> >On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 11:44:59PM +1000, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> >
> >>James Bottomley wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Sat, 2004-10-16 at 01:51, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>So this problem seems related to highmem.
> >
> >
> ><snip>
> >
> >>The above required a fair few changes to scsi_debug.
> >>Attached is a patch that rolls "kmap" changes with
> >>patches I have sent recently for scsi_debug.
> >>Attachment is gzipped (due to size) and applies against
> >>lk 2.6.8.1 -> lk 2.6.9-rc4 .
> >>
> >>Nishanth, could you test this with highmem?
> >
> >
> >Doug,
> >
> >I ran 2.6.9-rc4 with your patch applied and had several dump_stack()s
> >occur (complaining about sleeping in an invalid context) and a final
> >panic during mkfs :) I think something is still wrong... ;) Output is
> >below and attached.
>
> Ok, it looks like kmap_atomic() is needed.
> Could you try this additional patch.
Great! That patch seems to have fixed it. I am able to vi files, sync
the scsi_debug 'disks' and not have any hangs. It is noticeably slower,
though, it seems. Might that just be a side effect of the atomic calls?
Thanks again!
-Nish
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-18 23:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-15 19:01 scsi_debug issues Nishanth Aravamudan
2004-10-16 6:51 ` Douglas Gilbert
2004-10-16 10:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-16 13:12 ` James Bottomley
2004-10-18 13:44 ` [PATCH] scsi_debug [was: scsi_debug issues] Douglas Gilbert
2004-10-18 18:37 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2004-10-18 22:05 ` Douglas Gilbert
2004-10-18 23:23 ` Nishanth Aravamudan [this message]
2004-10-19 6:57 ` Douglas Gilbert
2004-10-21 21:36 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2004-10-22 10:04 ` Jens Axboe
2004-10-22 10:02 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041018232352.GA4747@us.ibm.com \
--to=nacc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=dougg@torque.net \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).