From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: "Moore, Eric Dean" <Emoore@lsil.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
jeremy@sgi.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] MPT Fusion driver 3.02.06 update
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:08:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041026160849.GA14917@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0E3FA95632D6D047BA649F95DAB60E57053AF0AE@exa-atlanta>
> This code code is ifdef'd with CPQ_CIM. We currently have this is enabled
> in the fusion Makefile. Instead would it be possible to have this disabled
> for inclusion
> in the kernel? Applications are in place now used by several customers
> using this
> interface, and it would be difficult to have this remove at this stage, as
> our
> customers are so close to shipment of product.
This code isn't acceptable for kernel inclusion at all, dito for the
hooks it needs (e.g. the sas device list)
> > please don't put this under all kinds of ifdefs, also it's
> > not working with
> > current mainline anymore anyway.
>
> I don't know what you mean. The fc_transport stuff was just added two weeks
> ago. This was added by request of Jeremy Higdon. This reports
> the port_id, port_name, and node_name. This support is enabled in
> the fusion Makefile by MPT_ENABLE_FC_TRANSPORT. Its currently disabled for
> reason (1) the transport layer is only available after 2.6.6 kernel, and
> we are supporting kernels older such as SUSE 9.1 and SLES9, (2)
> we would not be able to build driver update disks due to the dependancy
> of fc_transport.ko.
But the policy is to keep such ifdefs out of kernel drivers. If SuSE
wants current FC drivers backported they'll need to backpor the full
transport attr infrastructure.
Also as I mentioned this code doesn't compile on 2.6.10-rc at all.
> > Any reason there's no SPI transport attribute support, it's
> > rather asymetric
> > this way..
> >
>
> We are investigating into this, such as domain validation.
> What other attributes do you suggest?
if possible all that are define, see include/scsi/scsi_transport_spi.h
in a current kernel.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-26 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-26 16:02 [ANNOUNCE] MPT Fusion driver 3.02.06 update Moore, Eric Dean
2004-10-26 16:08 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-26 17:20 James.Smart
2004-10-26 17:03 Moore, Eric Dean
2004-10-26 17:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-26 20:29 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-10-25 23:32 Moore, Eric Dean
2004-10-26 8:09 ` Masao Fukuchi
2004-10-26 8:20 ` Douglas Gilbert
2004-10-26 9:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-26 10:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041026160849.GA14917@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=Emoore@lsil.com \
--cc=jeremy@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).