From: Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de>
To: Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com>
Cc: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
christophe varoqui <christophe.varoqui@free.fr>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [multipath] SCSI device capacity mess
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 20:21:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041028182154.GY32712@marowsky-bree.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041028181436.GA18874@beaverton.ibm.com>
On 2004-10-28T11:14:36, Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Can't we do a test-unit-ready before trying to read and then just not
> > read the partition table w/o so much noise?
> We already issue a TUR in sd_spinup_disk() prior to the READ CAPACITY and
> partition reads.
I'm just saying we should stop on the first failed command (TUR) and not
retry to read all 64 sectors regardless. I can live with one error per
passive path, but 64 really kills the logs.
Sincerely,
Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@suse.de>
--
High Availability & Clustering
SUSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX AG - A Novell company
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-29 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-26 23:27 [multipath] SCSI device capacity mess christophe varoqui
2004-10-26 21:34 ` James Bottomley
2004-10-26 21:46 ` christophe varoqui
2004-10-27 8:17 ` [dm-devel] " Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-10-27 8:42 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-10-27 18:51 ` Bryan Henderson
2004-10-29 14:12 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-10-29 16:48 ` Bryan Henderson
2004-10-27 19:02 ` christophe varoqui
2004-10-27 19:37 ` Eddie Williams
2004-10-27 20:19 ` christophe varoqui
2004-10-27 20:34 ` Greg Freemyer
2004-10-27 20:28 ` Philip R Auld
2004-10-27 21:57 ` James Bottomley
2004-10-28 11:37 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-10-28 18:14 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-10-28 18:21 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree [this message]
2004-10-30 0:41 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-10-30 1:01 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-10-30 7:21 ` christophe varoqui
2004-10-30 8:22 ` christophe varoqui
2004-11-02 15:23 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-10-28 11:35 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041028182154.GY32712@marowsky-bree.de \
--to=lmb@suse.de \
--cc=christophe.varoqui@free.fr \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patmans@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).