From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick Mansfield Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [multipath] SCSI device capacity mess Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:01:31 -0700 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20041030010131.GA30336@beaverton.ibm.com> References: <1098833278.4914.24.camel@zezette> <20041027081713.GC32712@marowsky-bree.de> <1098903759.12464.32.camel@zezette> <1098914250.1588.1.camel@mulgrave> <20041028113728.GT32712@marowsky-bree.de> <20041028181436.GA18874@beaverton.ibm.com> <20041028182154.GY32712@marowsky-bree.de> <20041030004131.GA29908@beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from e6.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.106]:12220 "EHLO e6.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263565AbUJ3BBx (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Oct 2004 21:01:53 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041030004131.GA29908@beaverton.ibm.com> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Lars Marowsky-Bree Cc: device-mapper development , christophe varoqui , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 05:41:31PM -0700, Patrick Mansfield wrote: > > What is the result of the TUR? I did not see any information about it in other posts in this thread. > Also, if the device is already showing up you can just send a TUR via sg, you don't have to hack sd.c. I think the sg_turs command in sg_utils might tell us enough information on error, though I don't have any non-ready or borken devices readily available. elm3a211:~ # sg_turs /dev/sdb Completed 1 Test Unit Ready commands with 0 errors -- Patrick Mansfield