linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [2.6 patch] SCSI t128.c: remove an unused function
@ 2004-11-15  2:38 Adrian Bunk
  2004-11-15 14:40 ` Alan Cox
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Bunk @ 2004-11-15  2:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: James.Bottomley; +Cc: linux-scsi, linux-kernel

The patch below removes the unused function t128_setup.

Please review whether it's correct.


diffstat output:
 drivers/scsi/t128.c |   28 ----------------------------
 1 files changed, 28 deletions(-)


Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>

--- linux-2.6.10-rc1-mm5-full/drivers/scsi/t128.c.old	2004-11-14 01:31:48.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.10-rc1-mm5-full/drivers/scsi/t128.c	2004-11-14 01:37:27.000000000 +0100
@@ -154,34 +154,6 @@
 
 #define NO_SIGNATURES (sizeof (signatures) /  sizeof (struct signature))
 
-/*
- * Function : t128_setup(char *str, int *ints)
- *
- * Purpose : LILO command line initialization of the overrides array,
- * 
- * Inputs : str - unused, ints - array of integer parameters with ints[0]
- *	equal to the number of ints.
- *
- */
-
-void __init t128_setup(char *str, int *ints){
-    static int commandline_current = 0;
-    int i;
-    if (ints[0] != 2) 
-	printk("t128_setup : usage t128=address,irq\n");
-    else 
-	if (commandline_current < NO_OVERRIDES) {
-	    overrides[commandline_current].address = ints[1];
-	    overrides[commandline_current].irq = ints[2];
-	    for (i = 0; i < NO_BASES; ++i)
-		if (bases[i].address == ints[1]) {
-		    bases[i].noauto = 1;
-		    break;
-		}
-	    ++commandline_current;
-	}
-}
-
 /* 
  * Function : int t128_detect(Scsi_Host_Template * tpnt)
  *


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [2.6 patch] SCSI t128.c: remove an unused function
  2004-11-15  2:38 [2.6 patch] SCSI t128.c: remove an unused function Adrian Bunk
@ 2004-11-15 14:40 ` Alan Cox
  2004-11-15 17:03   ` Adrian Bunk
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2004-11-15 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Adrian Bunk; +Cc: James Bottomley, linux-scsi, Linux Kernel Mailing List

On Llu, 2004-11-15 at 02:38, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The patch below removes the unused function t128_setup.
> 
> Please review whether it's correct.

Its wrong. The fix is to make the setup function get called, IFF you can
find anyone with a t128 any more

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [2.6 patch] SCSI t128.c: remove an unused function
  2004-11-15 14:40 ` Alan Cox
@ 2004-11-15 17:03   ` Adrian Bunk
  2004-11-15 19:49     ` Alan Cox
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Bunk @ 2004-11-15 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alan Cox; +Cc: James Bottomley, linux-scsi, Linux Kernel Mailing List

On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 02:40:39PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Llu, 2004-11-15 at 02:38, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > The patch below removes the unused function t128_setup.
> > 
> > Please review whether it's correct.
> 
> Its wrong. The fix is to make the setup function get called, IFF you can
> find anyone with a t128 any more

Ah, it seems your t128 fix which did this in 2.4.17-pre7 is (like your 
dtc cleanup in the same patch) among the fixes not yet forward-ported 
from 2.4 to 2.6 ...

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [2.6 patch] SCSI t128.c: remove an unused function
  2004-11-15 17:03   ` Adrian Bunk
@ 2004-11-15 19:49     ` Alan Cox
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2004-11-15 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Adrian Bunk; +Cc: James Bottomley, linux-scsi, Linux Kernel Mailing List

On Llu, 2004-11-15 at 17:03, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 02:40:39PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Llu, 2004-11-15 at 02:38, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > The patch below removes the unused function t128_setup.
> > > 
> > > Please review whether it's correct.
> > 
> > Its wrong. The fix is to make the setup function get called, IFF you can
> > find anyone with a t128 any more
> 
> Ah, it seems your t128 fix which did this in 2.4.17-pre7 is (like your 
> dtc cleanup in the same patch) among the fixes not yet forward-ported 
> from 2.4 to 2.6 ...

Yep. Those probably want propogating so they don't get lost. Not that
5380's work in 2.6 with all the scsi changes as far as I can tell


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-11-15 20:54 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-11-15  2:38 [2.6 patch] SCSI t128.c: remove an unused function Adrian Bunk
2004-11-15 14:40 ` Alan Cox
2004-11-15 17:03   ` Adrian Bunk
2004-11-15 19:49     ` Alan Cox

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).