From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adrian Bunk Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] SCSI aic7xxx: kill kernel 2.2 #ifdef's (fwd) Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 03:06:35 +0100 Message-ID: <20041218020635.GJ21288@stusta.de> References: <20041216221802.GT12937@stusta.de> <41C2147D.1090603@osdl.org> <1103239700.21806.40.camel@localhost.localdomain> <41C23458.1080404@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:33031 "HELO mailout.stusta.mhn.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262814AbULRCGj (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Dec 2004 21:06:39 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41C23458.1080404@osdl.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "Randy.Dunlap" Cc: Alan Cox , Andrew Morton , James Bottomley , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 05:20:24PM -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: > >>I would really appreciate it if you could limit patches for major > >>subsystems to only the mailing list for those subsystems. > > > > > >And then I'd have missed the lapb error for example. At least for less > >maintained stuff do use this list > > netdev is _the_ mailing list for network-related development... > > scsi should happen on linux-scsi > > If we take your argument to an extreme, we only need > one mailing list. :( It does make sense: If you are _only_ interested in SCSI related development, linux-scsi is a good choice and a relatively low-volume list. > ~Randy cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed