From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave C Boutcher Subject: Re: [patch] ibmvscsi.c: remove max-sectors module parm Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 11:32:02 -0600 Message-ID: <20041231173202.GA10809@cs.umn.edu> References: <20041221223645.GA2736@cs.umn.edu> <1103828621.5290.42.camel@mulgrave> <20041223200153.GA18386@cs.umn.edu> <1103835435.5290.45.camel@mulgrave> <20041224003620.GA31981@cs.umn.edu> <1104451489.7580.27.camel@mulgrave> Reply-To: boutcher@cs.umn.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail.cs.umn.edu ([128.101.35.202]:38820 "EHLO mail.cs.umn.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262124AbULaRcG (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Dec 2004 12:32:06 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1104451489.7580.27.camel@mulgrave> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: SCSI Mailing List On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 06:04:48PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote: > What I mean is that after there's been argument over a patch I want an > updated diff (like the one below) with a new change log containing the > resolution, not a diff to a previous patch. OK, thanks for the guidance...new patch on its way. I have a number of subsequent patches which still apply fine (with some fuzz.) Would you like them resubmitted to get everything back in sync? -- Dave Boutcher