From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix gcc warning on 64 bit compile of gdth Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 08:27:28 +0000 Message-ID: <20050104082728.GA1731@infradead.org> References: <1104788704.5506.67.camel@mulgrave> <20050103224321.GY26051@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <1104792580.5506.69.camel@mulgrave> <20050103225401.GZ26051@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from [213.146.154.40] ([213.146.154.40]:5256 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261555AbVADI1d (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2005 03:27:33 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050103225401.GZ26051@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Al Viro Cc: James Bottomley , achim_leubner@adaptec.com, SCSI Mailing List On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 10:54:01PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > ... and dma_handle *is* dma_addr_t and gets used in exact same driver to > store the results of the same function (grep for pci_map_page in there). But as it looks do me the driver is doing two different dma mappings in here.