From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH] zfcp: kfree patch Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 23:06:39 -0800 Message-ID: <20050110070639.GC13078@kroah.com> References: <20050108223326.GB3415@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:51427 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262122AbVAJHGt (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jan 2005 02:06:49 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Heiko Carstens Cc: James Bottomley , SCSI Mailing List On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 07:53:19AM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > > this is my next attempt to try to get the patch below merged. Last > > > time Greg KH objected and it didn't get merged. > > > > As nothing has changed in the patch, I still object to it. Actually, > > krefs will BUG() out if you try to do this, so I might as well add a > > patch so that kobjects do the same thing... > > So what's the fix for this generic (non-zfcp specific) problem then? As no other code uses this type of "solution" I don't see how you can say it is "generic".