From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matti Aarnio Subject: Re: linux-scsi list filtering Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 10:41:24 +0200 Message-ID: <20050110084124.GL8704@mea-ext.zmailer.org> References: <41E1B79A.3080706@torque.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail.zmailer.org ([62.78.96.67]:18632 "EHLO mail.zmailer.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262155AbVAJIl1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jan 2005 03:41:27 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41E1B79A.3080706@torque.net> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Douglas Gilbert Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 09:00:42AM +1000, Douglas Gilbert wrote: > Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:00:42 +1000 > From: Douglas Gilbert > To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org > Cc: James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com > Subject: linux-scsi list filtering > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed You really should ask this kind of questions from as you can read at http://vger.kernel.org/ Possibly it is this one: Subject: BOUNCE linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org: global taboo header: /charset=.*windows-/i That pattern bites on quite a lot of spams and viruses, but unfortunately also on some amount of legitimate list messages. Reviewing past weeks worth of monitoring logs, it does appear that of 10-20 daily hits with that patterns there is always also some other pattern present when it genuinely is spam/virus/junk. I will now remove that block, and we shall see, what leaks thru... (if any.) > Twice yesterday I tried to reply to the "spin down idle > SATA disks" thread. The first was sent to the original > poster and cc-ed to this list. When my reply didn't appear > after 12 hours, I resent my reply directly to this list. > Neither appeared on the linux-scsi list (at least not via > my subscription or the marc.theaimsgroup.com archive). > > Obviously the original poster received my mail as he has > recently responded to the list. That tends to suggest > that incoming mail is being filtered by the linux-scsi > list. > > Is anyone else experiencing this type of behaviour? > > Doug Gilbert /Matti Aarnio -- one of