public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>,
	SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/10][RFC] linux-iscsi driver
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 09:59:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050111095920.GA18119@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1105404318.4477.18.camel@mulgrave>

On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 06:45:18PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 23:24 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Can you kill the ugly iscsi-sfnet name?  We also don't call out networking
> > code ipv4-swansea ;-)  Simple iscsi should be enough, or if you think that's
> > confusing vs driver for hardware offload cards maybe sw-iscsi.
> 
> Please not that can of worms again.
> 
> For the time being I think iscsi-sfnet will do since there's still one
> other possible linux iscsi stack around.  And we would probably have
> called our networking code ipv4-swansea if we also had an ipv4-bsd or
> something else one could use.
> 
> In the long run, there will be only a single iscsi driver, and it can be
> renamed as such, but in the short term we're not ready to choose.

I disagree.  We have been concentrating on this driver for a long time,
everyone whoe thinks his driver should have been _the_ software initiator
should have complained for a long time.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-01-11  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-10 22:57 [PATCH 4/10][RFC] linux-iscsi driver Mike Christie
2005-01-10 23:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-01-11  0:45   ` James Bottomley
2005-01-11  4:35     ` Dave Wysochanski
2005-01-11 15:44       ` James Bottomley
2005-01-11  9:59     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2005-01-11 15:47       ` James Bottomley
2005-01-11  1:09   ` Mike Christie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050111095920.GA18119@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox