From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergey Vlasov Subject: Re: [PATCH as470] Add a NOREPORTLUN blacklist flag Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 19:59:27 +0300 Message-ID: <20050220195927.398c57e4.vsu@altlinux.ru> References: <20050217221803.091fd840@hebus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Sun__20_Feb_2005_19_59_27_+0300_8vFxEbVBjh.rWgor" Received: from mail.murom.net ([213.177.124.17]:63161 "EHLO ns1.murom.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261876AbVBTQ7l (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Feb 2005 11:59:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Stern Cc: James Bottomley , Samuel Colin , SCSI development list --Signature=_Sun__20_Feb_2005_19_59_27_+0300_8vFxEbVBjh.rWgor Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:31:04 -0500 (EST) Alan Stern wrote: > James: > > This patch adds a NOREPORTLUN blacklist flag for a disk made by "WDC" > (Winchester?). The drive's firmware crashes when it receives > REPORT_LUNS, even though it claims to be SCSI rev 04. > > Alan Stern > > > > Signed-off-by: Alan Stern > > ===== drivers/scsi/scsi_devinfo.c 1.14 vs edited ===== > --- 1.14/drivers/scsi/scsi_devinfo.c 2004-12-10 11:54:56 -05:00 > +++ edited/drivers/scsi/scsi_devinfo.c 2005-02-16 11:30:56 -05:00 > @@ -201,6 +201,7 @@ > {"WangDAT", "Model 2600", "01.7", BLIST_SELECT_NO_ATN}, > {"WangDAT", "Model 3200", "02.2", BLIST_SELECT_NO_ATN}, > {"WangDAT", "Model 1300", "02.4", BLIST_SELECT_NO_ATN}, > + {"WDC WD25", "00JB-00FUA0", NULL, BLIST_NOREPORTLUN}, This does not look like a right solution. WD2500JB is an IDE disk made by Western Digital: http://www.wdc.com/en/products/Products.asp?DriveID=42 Therefore the problematic LaCie device is really an USB/Firewire-to-IDE adapter with the WD2500JB drive in a box. And it is the USB-IDE part which fails on the REPORT_LUNS command, not the IDE disk. Probably there are other LaCie devices with the same adapter but different disks inside; adding all such IDE disks to the SCSI blacklist does not seem like a good solution. The usb-storage blacklist seems like a better place for such entry. --Signature=_Sun__20_Feb_2005_19_59_27_+0300_8vFxEbVBjh.rWgor Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCGMHyW82GfkQfsqIRAuXoAJ9lG2vWIiIxOQnDFJ5ODIhhzMqGDgCeK9x2 dLV411jfMZkxWMMpIsxbJvQ= =K4Jg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Sun__20_Feb_2005_19_59_27_+0300_8vFxEbVBjh.rWgor--