From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Mark Haverkamp <markh@osdl.org>
Cc: Mark Salyzyn <mark_salyzyn@adaptec.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Ross Macintyre <raz@macs.hw.ac.uk>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: adaptec 2120S software under RedHat 8.0 and FC2
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 09:09:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050320090920.GA12000@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1111009971.17676.33.camel@markh1.pdx.osdl.net>
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 01:52:51PM -0800, Mark Haverkamp wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 08:02 -0500, Salyzyn, Mark wrote:
> > The applications require the Adaptec Branch of the driver in order to
> > function (mainly because the kernel.org branch drops the
> > /proc/scsi/aacraid entry). I have submitted a patch to Mark Haverkamp
> > for consideration where we add the information back to the /sys
> > filesystem, and the /proc filesystem (with CONFIG_PROC_FS defined) that
> > will help re-enable the applications.
>
> The proc info code was removed almost two years ago. I assume that it
> was removed because of the move away from using /proc and towards
> using /sys. Christoph, is that the reason for its removal?
Yes. Note that aacraid never had a non-trivial proc_info handler in mainline.
>
>
> Mark.
>
> >
> > There is also a Public GPL daemon, aeventd, that provides event services
> > that you may consider.
> >
> > I will provide the sources for both under separate cover.
> >
> > Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org
> > [mailto:linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Ross Macintyre
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 6:20 AM
> > To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: adaptec 2120S software under RedHat 8.0 and FC2
> >
> > Could someone possibly help?
> >
> > I have upgraded a machine from RedHat 8.0 to FC2 and the
> > adaptec-browser1 and adaptec-smbe software that I installed is not
> > working
> > properly. It looks ok at first glance but if I pull a disk out I only
> > get
> > informed of the 'informational' type messages.
> > (Also the browser interface to the RAID doesn't notice that the disk has
> > been pulled)
> >
> > These are the RPMs that I installed from adaptec:
> > adaptec-browser-1.2b-2
> > adaptec-smbe-1.01.005-0
> >
> > and I am running this kernel: 2.6.8-1.521smp
> >
> > Note the mail part works ok and I do get informational messages when I
> > use
> > the browser interface and I tell it to rescan, (the array is rebuilt
> > ok),
> > but after the disk is pulled, from the browser interface it still shows
> > the disk as being there, and it is only when I tell it to rescan that it
> > starts sending out the informational messages and rebuilds.
> > The messages are logged to /var/log/messages but it seems that anotifyd
> > is
> > not picking them up.
> >
> > Maybe I just need to upgrade the firmware and put on the latest RPMs?
> > I think I am at firmware revision 7244.
> >
> > I have attached the anotify.conf file.
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Ross
> >
> --
> Mark Haverkamp <markh@osdl.org>
>
---end quoted text---
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-20 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-16 13:02 adaptec 2120S software under RedHat 8.0 and FC2 Salyzyn, Mark
2005-03-16 21:52 ` Mark Haverkamp
2005-03-20 9:09 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-23 15:37 Salyzyn, Mark
2005-03-23 17:43 ` Markus Lidel
2005-03-28 21:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-03-22 17:43 Salyzyn, Mark
2005-03-23 11:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-03-17 13:41 Salyzyn, Mark
2005-03-20 9:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-03-22 16:32 ` Ross Macintyre
2005-03-23 11:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-03-23 17:53 ` Markus Lidel
2005-03-24 17:19 ` Ross Macintyre
2005-03-16 11:20 Ross Macintyre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050320090920.GA12000@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark_salyzyn@adaptec.com \
--cc=markh@osdl.org \
--cc=raz@macs.hw.ac.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox