public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: James.Smart@Emulex.Com
Cc: matthew@wil.cx, dgilbert@interlog.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi_mid_low_api doesn't mention scsi_scan_host
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:59:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050321155922.GU21986@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9BB4DECD4CFE6D43AA8EA8D768ED51C201AB43@xbl3.ad.emulex.com>

On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 09:50:07AM -0500, James.Smart@Emulex.Com wrote:
> > + *      successful call to scsi_host_alloc().  The LLD must call
> > + *	scsi_scan_host() in order to scan the bus.  The LLD must set up
> > + *	the transport template before calling this function and may only
> > + *	access the transport class data after this function has 
> > been called.
> 
> It is not mandatory that the LLD call scsi_scan_host(). Although this used
> to be the case, a few changes have been made in the midlayer recently as we
> attempted to have the transports perform scanning on behalf of the LLD's.
> The scsi_scan_target() function can now be used instead of scsi_scan_host().
> (note: the symbol scsi_scan_single_target() was added briefly, then removed
> as scsi_scan_target was exported).  In the case of the LLD's using the FC
> transport, the need not call any scan function. The FC transport calls
> scsi_scan_target() for them.

Thanks for the correction.  How does this look?

 *      Notes: Only required in "hotplug initialization model" after a
 *      successful call to scsi_host_alloc().  This function does not
 *      scan the bus; this can be done by calling scsi_scan_host() or
 *      in some other transport-specific way.  The LLD must set up
 *      the transport template before calling this function and may only
 *      access the transport class data after this function has been called.


-- 
"Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon 
the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those
conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse
to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince 
himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep 
he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain

  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-21 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-21 14:50 [PATCH] scsi_mid_low_api doesn't mention scsi_scan_host James.Smart
2005-03-21 15:59 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-21 22:52 James.Smart
2005-03-24  8:45 ` Douglas Gilbert
2005-03-21 13:43 Matthew Wilcox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050321155922.GU21986@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
    --to=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=James.Smart@Emulex.Com \
    --cc=dgilbert@interlog.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox