* [PATCH] rm unused scan delay var
@ 2005-03-26 6:16 Mike Christie
2005-03-29 14:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mike Christie @ 2005-03-26 6:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 180 bytes --]
Is FC_SCSI_SCAN_DELAY used by a FC driver that is
not yet in mainline? This patch just deletes it
if not since no one else is.
Signed-off-by: Mike Chrisite <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
[-- Attachment #2: rm-unused-scan-delay.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 409 bytes --]
--- scsi-misc-2.6.orig/include/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.h 2005-03-25 21:35:06.000000000 -0800
+++ scsi-misc-2.6.test/include/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.h 2005-03-25 22:01:49.000000000 -0800
@@ -212,9 +212,6 @@ struct fc_rport { /* aka fc_starget_attr
#define rport_to_shost(r) \
dev_to_shost(r->dev.parent)
-#define FC_SCSI_SCAN_DELAY (1 * HZ) /* 1 second delay */
-
-
/*
* FC SCSI Target Attributes
*
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] rm unused scan delay var
2005-03-26 6:16 [PATCH] rm unused scan delay var Mike Christie
@ 2005-03-29 14:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2005-03-29 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Christie; +Cc: linux-scsi
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 10:16:19PM -0800, Mike Christie wrote:
> Is FC_SCSI_SCAN_DELAY used by a FC driver that is
> not yet in mainline? This patch just deletes it
> if not since no one else is.
It's not used by either the Emulex or the rewritten qlogic driver, so
it can probably go away.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-03-29 14:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-03-26 6:16 [PATCH] rm unused scan delay var Mike Christie
2005-03-29 14:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox