From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Higdon Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use proper seq_file api for /proc/scsi/scsi Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 00:23:46 -0700 Message-ID: <20050408072345.GA1018765@sgi.com> References: <42550173.1040503@suse.de> <20050407103123.GB9586@infradead.org> <425517B3.2010702@suse.de> <20050407112412.GA12072@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:42900 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262728AbVDHHZw (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2005 03:25:52 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050407112412.GA12072@infradead.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig , Hannes Reinecke , Linux Kernel , SCSI Mailing List On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 12:24:12PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 01:21:23PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > > > /proc/scsi/scsi is deprecated and even only compiled in if > > > "legacy /proc/scsi/ support" is enabled. Please move over to lssci which > > > is using sysfs ASAP. > > > > > Ah. And that's enough reason for it not to work properly? > > Deprecated as it may be, but one could at least expect it to _work_. > > It works for those setups that already worked with 2.4.x, aka only a few > luns. Even if it's deprecated, wouldn't it be good to fix it as long as it's there, unless it hurts something else? Or at least fix the out of memory error, even if it doesn't display all the luns? jeremy