From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE 2/6] Linux-iSCSI High-Performance Initiator Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:14:03 +0100 Message-ID: <20050412081403.GA551@infradead.org> References: <425B3F58.2040000@yahoo.com> <20050412053650.GF32372@kroah.com> <20050412072733.GA32354@infradead.org> <20050412074514.GA1630@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:44460 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262046AbVDLIOH (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Apr 2005 04:14:07 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050412074514.GA1630@kroah.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Greg KH Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Alex Aizman , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 12:45:14AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > Um, why? We've been down this road before, and for types that cross the > boundry, we _must_ use the __ version of the kernel types, not the > uint32_t stuff. That's total bullshit. C99 types just work in both the kernel and userland, while __u* types need to be typedefed to these exact C99 everywhere in userland bnecause they're only provided in kernelspace.