From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: 5.x branch mainline kernel push in two weeks? Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:49:18 +0200 Message-ID: <20050420084918.GA345@lst.de> References: <1113844382.13939.230.camel@beastie> <20050418181352.GA2983@lst.de> <426612D7.3010701@cs.wisc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:11158 "EHLO mail.lst.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261493AbVDTIt2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Apr 2005 04:49:28 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <426612D7.3010701@cs.wisc.edu> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: open-iscsi@googlegroups.com Cc: linux-iscsi development team , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 01:29:11AM -0700, Mike Christie wrote: > Are you going to try and push someone like qla4010 which has a similar > interface to qla2xxx (it uses the msg box interface) to use the netlink > interface? With a lot of the iscsi stuff masked away it seems a little > difficult to go the extent open-iscsi did? I'm not sure we should care too much about the qla4xxx driver. It's never been posted to linux-scsi, and the driver they pushed to SuSE ignores everything we've said about scsi low-level drivers. It looks like the iSCSI part of Qlogic simply doesn't care about Linux (that is upstream, not the major forks)