public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Wireless transport?
@ 2005-04-24 19:24 Guennadi Liakhovetski
  2005-04-24 22:55 ` Guy
  2005-04-25  1:07 ` Patrick Mansfield
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski @ 2005-04-24 19:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-scsi

Hi

An idle curiousity - some time ago I asked myself what would be the next 
transport - wireless? Then a few weeks ago I saw a "wireless hard-drive" 
in a local computer store. Didn't look at it closely, but I assume it 
comes with an ad-hoc win driver.

So, the question is - is it happening? Any standards appearing? Any 
drivers being developed? If there's anything - it would be logical to 
assume that it would implement a SCSI protocol, would it become a new 
transport?

Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* RE: Wireless transport?
  2005-04-24 19:24 Wireless transport? Guennadi Liakhovetski
@ 2005-04-24 22:55 ` Guy
  2005-04-25  1:07 ` Patrick Mansfield
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Guy @ 2005-04-24 22:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Guennadi Liakhovetski', linux-scsi

My guess is the thing is a SAMBA server or similar.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-scsi-
> owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Guennadi Liakhovetski
> Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 3:25 PM
> To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Wireless transport?
> 
> Hi
> 
> An idle curiousity - some time ago I asked myself what would be the next
> transport - wireless? Then a few weeks ago I saw a "wireless hard-drive"
> in a local computer store. Didn't look at it closely, but I assume it
> comes with an ad-hoc win driver.
> 
> So, the question is - is it happening? Any standards appearing? Any
> drivers being developed? If there's anything - it would be logical to
> assume that it would implement a SCSI protocol, would it become a new
> transport?
> 
> Thanks
> Guennadi
> ---
> Guennadi Liakhovetski
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Wireless transport?
  2005-04-24 19:24 Wireless transport? Guennadi Liakhovetski
  2005-04-24 22:55 ` Guy
@ 2005-04-25  1:07 ` Patrick Mansfield
  2005-04-25 20:08   ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Mansfield @ 2005-04-25  1:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Guennadi Liakhovetski; +Cc: linux-scsi

On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 09:24:53PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hi
> 
> An idle curiousity - some time ago I asked myself what would be the next 
> transport - wireless? Then a few weeks ago I saw a "wireless hard-drive" 
> in a local computer store. Didn't look at it closely, but I assume it 
> comes with an ad-hoc win driver.
> 
> So, the question is - is it happening? Any standards appearing? Any 
> drivers being developed? If there's anything - it would be logical to 
> assume that it would implement a SCSI protocol, would it become a new 
> transport?

No, just use iSCSI on top of the network.

You still need a hardware transport for the actual disks on the back end,
but SATA or IDE could be used over iSCSI via iSCSI software target (export
a block device, or file system file as a LUN).

-- Patrick Mansfield

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* RE: Wireless transport?
  2005-04-25  1:07 ` Patrick Mansfield
@ 2005-04-25 20:08   ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski @ 2005-04-25 20:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Guy, Patrick Mansfield; +Cc: linux-scsi

Thanks for the replies

On Sun, 24 Apr 2005, Guy wrote:

> My guess is the thing is a SAMBA server or similar.

Yeah, logical:-) Didn't think about that.

On Sun, 24 Apr 2005, Patrick Mansfield wrote:

> No, just use iSCSI on top of the network.

Sure, that'd be doable. Just have no idea - isn't it too much overhead? 
Say, over bluetooth, IP is already pretty high on the stack. OTOH, one 
could, possibly, take advantage of some features natively present in lower 
wireless levels, that don't get exported over IP?

Disclaimer: I am quite ignorant about wireless as well as iSCSI internals, 
so, feel free to ignore me, if I am talking nonsense, however, would be 
grateful for any education:-)

Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-04-25 20:11 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-04-24 19:24 Wireless transport? Guennadi Liakhovetski
2005-04-24 22:55 ` Guy
2005-04-25  1:07 ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-04-25 20:08   ` Guennadi Liakhovetski

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox