From: Andries Brouwer <Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
Cc: Andries Brouwer <aebr@win.tue.nl>,
"Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
joecool1029@gmail.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: Empty partition nodes not created (was device node issues with recent mm's and udev)
Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 10:43:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050506084259.GB25418@apps.cwi.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050506081009.GX23013@shell0.pdx.osdl.net>
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 01:10:09AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Andries Brouwer (aebr@win.tue.nl) wrote:
> > No, there is no problem but an intentional change in behaviour in -mm
> > and now also in 2.6.11.8.
>
> I think this should be backed out of -stable.
I was surprised to find it in, after I had written
============
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 21:58:07 +0200
For the time being, although I do not object to the patch,
obviously, since it is my own, I cannot see any reason to
add it to the "fixed" release.
============
but maybe including it was done by mistake?
It wasn't mentioned, I think, in the changelog.
There was a report that it fixed an oops,
but the report is unconfirmed and ununderstood.
Should it be backed out of 2.6.11.8? Possibly - but if it will be
part of 2.6.12 or 2.6.13 then I would be inclined to leave it.
Andrew asks whether it should be removed from -mm.
Will first read all my mail and then reply to that letter.
Maybe you should coordinate with Andrew and take the same decision.
Andries
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-06 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <d4757e6005050219514ece0c0a@mail.gmail.com>
2005-05-03 3:14 ` Empty partition nodes not created (was device node issues with recent mm's and udev) Greg KH
2005-05-03 3:26 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-05-03 4:18 ` Joe
2005-05-03 5:16 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-05-06 8:04 ` Andries Brouwer
2005-05-06 16:43 ` Bryan Henderson
2005-05-03 10:55 ` Paulo Marques
2005-05-03 23:34 ` Joe
2005-05-06 8:00 ` Andries Brouwer
2005-05-06 8:10 ` Chris Wright
2005-05-06 8:43 ` Andries Brouwer [this message]
2005-05-06 9:05 ` Andrew Morton
2005-05-06 14:12 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-06 14:26 ` David Woodhouse
2005-05-06 14:34 ` Kay Sievers
2005-05-06 14:18 ` Kay Sievers
2005-05-06 15:50 ` Greg KH
2005-05-06 7:58 ` Andries Brouwer
[not found] <3ZVNP-5cq-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <E1DTAgo-0002uD-F0@be1.7eggert.dyndns.org>
2005-05-04 3:49 ` Joe
2005-05-04 4:47 ` Grant Coady
2005-05-04 11:42 ` Bodo Eggert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050506084259.GB25418@apps.cwi.nl \
--to=andries.brouwer@cwi.nl \
--cc=aebr@win.tue.nl \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=joecool1029@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rddunlap@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox