From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: several messages Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 09:12:30 +0100 Message-ID: <20050513081230.GA32546@infradead.org> References: <1416215015.20050504193114@dns.toxicfilms.tv> <1115236116.7761.19.camel@dhollis-lnx.sunera.com> <1104082357.20050504231722@dns.toxicfilms.tv> <1115305794.3071.5.camel@dhollis-lnx.sunera.com> <20050507150538.GA800@favonius> <4281C8A3.20804@vlnb.net> <1115864176.5513.37.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1115922732.25161.143.camel@beastie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:7132 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262295AbVEMIMq (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 May 2005 04:12:46 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1115922732.25161.143.camel@beastie> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Dmitry Yusupov Cc: mingz@ele.uri.edu, Guennadi Liakhovetski , FUJITA Tomonori , Vladislav Bolkhovitin , iet-dev , linux-scsi , Sander , David Hollis , Maciej Soltysiak , linux-kernel On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:32:12AM -0700, Dmitry Yusupov wrote: > On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 22:16 -0400, Ming Zhang wrote: > > iscsi is scsi over ip. > > correction. iSCSI today has RFC at least for two transports - TCP/IP and > iSER/RDMA(in finalized progress) with RDMA over Infiniband or RNIC. And > I think people start writing initial draft for SCTP/IP transport... > > >From this perspective, iSCSI certainly more advanced and matured > comparing to NBD variations. It's for certainly much more complicated (in marketing speak that's usually called advanced) but far less mature. If you want network storage to just work use nbd.