From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dinakar Guniguntala Subject: Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ? Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 20:10:34 +0530 Message-ID: <20050518144034.GB3937@in.ibm.com> References: <20050516085832.GA9558@gmail.com> <20050517071307.GA4794@in.ibm.com> <20050517002908.005a9ba7.akpm@osdl.org> <1116340465.4989.2.camel@mulgrave> <20050517170824.GA3931@in.ibm.com> <1116354894.4989.42.camel@mulgrave> <20050518090722.GA3937@in.ibm.com> <1116425559.5027.1.camel@mulgrave> Reply-To: dino@in.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1116425559.5027.1.camel@mulgrave> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Andrew Morton , gregoire.favre@gmail.com, Linux Kernel , SCSI Mailing List List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 09:12:39AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > > > > So are these patches getting into -mm first or -rc5 ?? > > Damn, I knew you were going to ask that ... the problem is it's the last > in a long line of invasive adaptec patches that sit in my scsi-misc-2.6 > tree ... I suppose we can't have the aic driver slightly hosed for > 2.6.12; I'll see if I can extract them. > You actually thought you could get away with that ?? :) Seriously, scsi takes a long time to boot even normally, but with this bug, it takes forever and a few more retries before it finally boots up. I would really appreciate if you could extract and send them upstream, Thanks -Dinakar