From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: device suspend/resume Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 16:45:16 -0400 Message-ID: <20050523204516.GA28058@havoc.gtf.org> References: <20050523201535.GA24298@havoc.gtf.org> <1116880875.5021.34.camel@mulgrave> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from atlmail.prod.rxgsys.com ([69.61.70.25]:30116 "EHLO bastet.signetmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261960AbVEWUp0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 May 2005 16:45:26 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1116880875.5021.34.camel@mulgrave> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: SCSI Mailing List , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 03:41:15PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 16:15 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Patch is via Mark Lord, > > Um, it is? it looks identical to this one from Jens (down to the > gratuitous style corrections) > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=111409327100001 Got it "via" Mark Lord; I didn't know the proper attribution. > However, before anything happens I'd like to get the SCSI pieces > correct. The "anything" I want to happen here is getting the SCSI pieces correct ;-) > The thread petered out before a resolution, however, I think > at least disk devices should be doing a synchronize cache on suspend. Agreed. Jeff