public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PROBLEM] aic7xxx: DV failed to configure device
@ 2005-06-06  8:16 Denis Zaitsev
  2005-06-06  8:19 ` Arjan van de Ven
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Denis Zaitsev @ 2005-06-06  8:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: linux-scsi

I'm testing an Adaptec SCSI controller + an IBM drive.  All the things
used to be fine before I had made the low-level format of the drive
(thru the Ctrl-A Adaptec's menu).  And now after

        modprobe aic7xxx

I have:


scsi0 : Adaptec AIC7XXX EISA/VLB/PCI SCSI HBA DRIVER, Rev 6.2.36
        <Adaptec 29160 Ultra160 SCSI adapter>
        aic7892: Ultra160 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 32/253 SCBs

scsi0:A:0:0: DV failed to configure device.  Please file a bug report against this driver.
(scsi0:A:0): 160.000MB/s transfers (80.000MHz DT, offset 63, 16bit)
  Vendor: IBM       Model: DDYS-T09170N      Rev: S80D
  Type:   Direct-Access                      ANSI SCSI revision: 03
scsi0:A:0:0: Tagged Queuing enabled.  Depth 32
SCSI device sda: 17916240 512-byte hdwr sectors (9173 MB)
SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back
SCSI device sda: 17916240 512-byte hdwr sectors (9173 MB)
SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back
 sda: unknown partition table
Attached scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0


The message

scsi0:A:0:0: DV failed to configure device.  Please file a bug report against this driver.

had never appeared before the low-level format.  But it seems that
after the format the drive still works fine.

So, what does this message mean?  And can I just ignore it?

Some additional info: it's the PCI64 card installed in a 32-bit PCI
slot, Domain Validation is turned on thru the Adaptec BIOS setup.

Thanks in advance.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PROBLEM] aic7xxx: DV failed to configure device
  2005-06-06  8:16 [PROBLEM] aic7xxx: DV failed to configure device Denis Zaitsev
@ 2005-06-06  8:19 ` Arjan van de Ven
  2005-06-06  9:03   ` Denis Zaitsev
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Arjan van de Ven @ 2005-06-06  8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Denis Zaitsev; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-scsi

On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 14:16 +0600, Denis Zaitsev wrote:
> I'm testing an Adaptec SCSI controller + an IBM drive.  All the things
> used to be fine before I had made the low-level format of the drive
> (thru the Ctrl-A Adaptec's menu).  And now after
> 
>         modprobe aic7xxx


you failed to mention which exact kernel you were using...
(that matters since the aic7xxx driver changes a lot over time, and
especially it changed recently in this area a lot)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PROBLEM] aic7xxx: DV failed to configure device
  2005-06-06  8:19 ` Arjan van de Ven
@ 2005-06-06  9:03   ` Denis Zaitsev
  2005-06-06 14:34     ` James Bottomley
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Denis Zaitsev @ 2005-06-06  9:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arjan van de Ven; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-scsi

On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 10:19:45AM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 14:16 +0600, Denis Zaitsev wrote:
> > I'm testing an Adaptec SCSI controller + an IBM drive.  All the things
> > used to be fine before I had made the low-level format of the drive
> > (thru the Ctrl-A Adaptec's menu).  And now after
> > 
> >         modprobe aic7xxx
> 
> 
> you failed to mention which exact kernel you were using...

Yes, I'm sorry.  2.6.10.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PROBLEM] aic7xxx: DV failed to configure device
  2005-06-06  9:03   ` Denis Zaitsev
@ 2005-06-06 14:34     ` James Bottomley
  2005-06-07 13:16       ` Denis Zaitsev
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2005-06-06 14:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Denis Zaitsev; +Cc: Arjan van de Ven, Linux Kernel, SCSI Mailing List

On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 15:03 +0600, Denis Zaitsev wrote:
> Yes, I'm sorry.  2.6.10.

That particular code was completely changed for 2.6.12-rc5; could you
see what that kernel makes of this, please?

Thanks,

James



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PROBLEM] aic7xxx: DV failed to configure device
  2005-06-06 14:34     ` James Bottomley
@ 2005-06-07 13:16       ` Denis Zaitsev
  2005-06-07 16:37         ` James Bottomley
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Denis Zaitsev @ 2005-06-07 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: James Bottomley; +Cc: Arjan van de Ven, Linux Kernel, SCSI Mailing List

On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 09:34:37AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 15:03 +0600, Denis Zaitsev wrote:
> > Yes, I'm sorry.  2.6.10.
> 
> That particular code was completely changed for 2.6.12-rc5; could you
> see what that kernel makes of this, please?

Ok, 2.6.12-rc5:


scsi0 : Adaptec AIC7XXX EISA/VLB/PCI SCSI HBA DRIVER, Rev 6.2.36
        <Adaptec 29160 Ultra160 SCSI adapter>
        aic7892: Ultra160 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 32/253 SCBs

  Vendor: IBM       Model: DDYS-T09170N      Rev: S80D
  Type:   Direct-Access                      ANSI SCSI revision: 03
scsi0:A:0:0: Tagged Queuing enabled.  Depth 32
 target0:0:0: Beginning Domain Validation
WIDTH IS 1
(scsi0:A:0): 6.600MB/s transfers (16bit)
 target0:0:0: Domain Validation skipping write tests
(scsi0:A:0): 160.000MB/s transfers (80.000MHz DT, offset 63, 16bit)
 target0:0:0: Ending Domain Validation
SCSI device sda: 17916240 512-byte hdwr sectors (9173 MB)
SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back
SCSI device sda: 17916240 512-byte hdwr sectors (9173 MB)
SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back
 sda: unknown partition table
Attached scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0


It seems that things are in order, do I understand right?  So, why and
how the low-level format affects the old driver's behaviour?

Thanks in advance.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PROBLEM] aic7xxx: DV failed to configure device
  2005-06-07 13:16       ` Denis Zaitsev
@ 2005-06-07 16:37         ` James Bottomley
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2005-06-07 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Denis Zaitsev; +Cc: Arjan van de Ven, Linux Kernel, SCSI Mailing List

On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 19:16 +0600, Denis Zaitsev wrote:
> It seems that things are in order, do I understand right?  So, why and
> how the low-level format affects the old driver's behaviour?

I can't answer that ... part of the reason for ditching the in-driver
aic7xxx DV is that it was where an astonishing number of bugs kept
turning up.

James



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-06-07 18:01 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-06-06  8:16 [PROBLEM] aic7xxx: DV failed to configure device Denis Zaitsev
2005-06-06  8:19 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-06-06  9:03   ` Denis Zaitsev
2005-06-06 14:34     ` James Bottomley
2005-06-07 13:16       ` Denis Zaitsev
2005-06-07 16:37         ` James Bottomley

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox