public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
Cc: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] use scatter lists for all block pc requests and simplify hw handlers
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 20:07:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050607180716.GA8172@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1117847972.23638.62.camel@mina>

On Fri, Jun 03 2005, Mike Christie wrote:
> The following patches should enable the use of scatter lists for all
> REQ_BLOCK_PC requests and cleanup some code duplication or dangerous
> memory allocations in the dm-multipath hw handlers and
> block/scsi_ioctl.c.
> 
> REQ_BLOCK_PC scatter list usage only required converting the old
> sg_scsi_ioctl code to do bio backed requests since the current block
> layer SG_IO code will always use requests with bios. But while
> converting the old ioctl and removing some dangerous (GFP_KERNEL in
> failover path) memory allocations from a dm-multipath hw_handler (and
> while updating the LSI one) I was able to seperate some common code into
> two new functions: blk_rq_map_kern() and bio_map_kern. These functions
> are similar to their blk/bio*user cousins where they allocate requests
> and bios and setup the data pointers except they work on kernel buffers.

Wonderful stuff, much needed for a long time.

> The goal is next convert the scsi 'special' requests to use these
> functions, so scsi will be able to use block layer functions for scatter
> lists setup for all requests. And then hopefully one day we will not
> need those stinking "if (sc->use_sg)" paths all over our scsi drivers.

I've slowly been doing the same thing in other places in the kernel and
this bit has been talked about between James and I for at least a year
or two.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-06-07 18:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-04  1:19 [PATCH RFC 0/4] use scatter lists for all block pc requests and simplify hw handlers Mike Christie
2005-06-04 16:07 ` James Bottomley
2005-06-05  7:15   ` Mike Christie
2005-06-05  9:41     ` [dm-devel] " christophe varoqui
2005-06-06 13:31       ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2005-06-07  0:04         ` Michael Christie
2005-06-07  7:01           ` [dm-devel] " Lars Marowsky-Bree
2005-06-05 14:40     ` James Bottomley
2005-06-05 19:11       ` James Bottomley
2005-06-06  5:43         ` Douglas Gilbert
2005-06-06 14:19           ` James Bottomley
2005-06-07 13:08             ` Douglas Gilbert
2005-06-07 13:34               ` Tony Battersby
2005-06-07 16:34                 ` James Bottomley
2005-06-07 18:38                   ` [PATCH RFC 0/4] use scatter lists for all blockpc " Tony Battersby
2005-06-07 18:43                     ` Jens Axboe
2005-06-07 15:59               ` [PATCH RFC 0/4] use scatter lists for all block pc " James Bottomley
2005-06-07 18:07                 ` Jens Axboe
2005-06-07 19:26                   ` James Bottomley
2005-06-08  7:09                     ` Jens Axboe
2005-06-06 19:02     ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-06-07 15:26       ` Michael Christie
2005-06-07 18:23         ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-06-08 15:41           ` Mike Christie
2005-06-09  0:08             ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-06-09  6:18               ` Jens Axboe
2005-06-09 11:51                 ` James Bottomley
2005-06-09 11:54                   ` Jens Axboe
2005-06-07 12:10   ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-06-07 12:20     ` James Bottomley
2005-06-07 15:36       ` Michael Christie
2005-06-07 15:45         ` [dm-devel] " Michael Christie
2005-06-07 16:26           ` Kai Makisara
2005-06-07 19:23             ` James Bottomley
2005-06-07 18:09         ` Jens Axboe
2005-06-08 12:46           ` Mike Christie
2005-06-07 18:07 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2005-06-07 19:38   ` James Bottomley
2005-06-08  3:00     ` Douglas Gilbert
2005-06-08 12:59       ` James Bottomley
2005-06-08 14:50         ` Luben Tuikov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050607180716.GA8172@suse.de \
    --to=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox