From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove drivers/fc4/ Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 22:28:05 +0100 Message-ID: <20050619212805.GA17205@infradead.org> References: <20050619113723.GA18757@lst.de> <20050619.125747.35507641.davem@davemloft.net> <20050619204008.GA26389@lst.de> <20050619212338.GN29811@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:36302 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261330AbVFSV2K (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Jun 2005 17:28:10 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050619212338.GN29811@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Al Viro Cc: "David S. Miller" , jejb@steeleye.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 10:23:38PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > > Who? looking at sparclinux doesn't show anyone who got it working > > since 2.2.x days. > > Umm... sparc64 does work with 2.6. I don't have any fiberchannel > hardware in question, but both 2.4 and 2.6 work on Ultra just fine. > Ought to try and resurrect the quad-SS20 box and see what's the > situation with sparc32 one of these days... Huh? 'sparclinux' in this contect is the sparclinux mainlinglist, and 'it' refers to drivers/fc4