From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [PATCH, scsi-block-2.6] remove bio_map_user Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:41:14 +0200 Message-ID: <20050620104114.GD15021@suse.de> References: <20050619092946.GA16872@lst.de> <20050620103709.GA15021@suse.de> <20050620103656.GA4164@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:36574 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261183AbVFTKj4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 06:39:56 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050620103656.GA4164@lst.de> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: jejb@steeleye.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 20 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 12:37:13PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 19 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > It's only used by blk_rq_map_user and that's the only sensible caller. > > > > That's not really true, there is/are valid uses of bio_map_user() alone. > > That would be? Stacking drivers or file systems. > > > > > So do the iov wrapping there and kill bio_map_user. > > > > While I do agree with the change, I know of external users of > > bio_map_user(). > > Who's that? ocfs2, iirc. -- Jens Axboe