From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Q: qla23xxx and lpfc (Was: Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI updates for 2.6.12) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:45:44 +0100 Message-ID: <20050620104544.GA28488@infradead.org> References: <1119103586.4984.5.camel@mulgrave> <20050618141636.GA4112@infradead.org> <20050618174558.GX9153@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <1119260140.6099.0.camel@mulgrave> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:2777 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261165AbVFTKpt (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 06:45:49 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Tomasz K?oczko Cc: James Bottomley , Chris Wright , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , SCSI Mailing List , Linux Kernel On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 12:33:49PM +0200, Tomasz K?oczko wrote: > Included in vanilla 2.6.12 qla23xxx 8.00.02b5 is for me unuseable (fails > on scaning luns and oopses on array controler reset) on x86_64 with > qla2300 and for me works only version 8.01.00b2. > Is it will be possible include this version in official tree ? As said above a bad patch from Qlogic went in and Linus didn't pull the release critical fixes tree before release. It'll be fixed in 2.6.12.1. 8.01.00b2 is full of crap and despite the higher version number actually a regression vs the kernel driver in various aspects. > Also is it will be possible include Emulex lpfc driver to official tree ? See drivers/scsi/lpfc/