Re: [PATCH, scsi-block-2.6] remove bio_map_user

[Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>]

On Mon, Jun 20 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 12:41:14PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > That would be?
> > 
> > Stacking drivers or file systems.
> 
> Doesn't make sense, a stacking driver must not deal with locking down
> user memory at all, and for filesystem there's better helpers in

That's a very generic statement to make, there could be valid uses of
that. But the point of the matter is that I don't think we should just
remove bio_map_user() and intentionally break an exported API to save a
few bytes. We are not talking a lot of code, it's just a wrapper.

> fs/direct-io.c

That's true, I'll give you that.

> > > > While I do agree with the change, I know of external users of
> > > > bio_map_user().
> > > 
> > > Who's that?
> > 
> > ocfs2, iirc.
> 
> ocfs2 doesn't use bio_map_user

It did at some point in time, I don't track the tree so apparently they
stopped doing so at some point.

-- 
Jens Axboe