From: Mike Anderson <andmike@us.ibm.com>
To: Christophe Varoqui <christophe.varoqui@free.fr>,
Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com>,
James.Smart@Emulex.Com
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Fwd] further testing w/ multipath ... and bugs
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:05:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050623210536.GA20141@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050613123053.GB28625@averon.dyndns.org>
I did not see an answer to this issue. I am also hitting the problem
(i.e., devices being removed) during some dm-mp port bounce testing.
Is this the correct behavior going forward for the fc transport?
Also I see a difference in behavior between the lpfc and qla2xxx drivers
where the lpfc is not removing target even though the "rport-5:0-5: blocked
FC remote port time out: removing target" message is printed. I guess I
can look into the difference myself, but I thought Andrew or James S you
two would know.
Christophe Varoqui [christophe.varoqui@free.fr] wrote:
> I should have posted this here in the first place.
> Seems related to the recent fc_remote_ports and qlogic work.
>
> Regards,
> cvaroqui
>
> ----- Forwarded message from Christophe Varoqui <christophe.varoqui@free.fr> -----
>
> List-Id: device-mapper development <dm-devel.redhat.com>
>
> Here is an additional one :
>
> When at the end of the previous scenario, with a dd in D-state, I "dmsetup remove_all" ... it effectively accept to remove the maps. Exec'ing multipath again gives :
>
> [<c027506c>] end_that_request_last+0xcc/0x100
> [<c02b19ed>] scsi_end_request+0x9d/0xe0
> [<c02b1d45>] scsi_io_completion+0x155/0x500
> [<c0327643>] ip_rcv+0x3a3/0x560
> [<c012c1de>] del_timer+0x5e/0x70
> [<c02cdce4>] sd_rw_intr+0x164/0x320
> [<c0149531>] mempool_free+0x81/0xa0
> [<c02c60cd>] qla2x00_process_response_queue+0x14d/0x1d0
> [<c02ac946>] scsi_finish_command+0x96/0xe0
> [<c033f2e3>] tcp_write_timer+0x73/0xe0
> [<c02ac836>] scsi_softirq+0xa6/0xe0
> [<c01285b2>] __do_softirq+0x82/0x100
> [<c0128665>] do_softirq+0x35/0x40
> [<c010675b>] do_IRQ+0x3b/0x70
> [<c0104c1e>] common_interrupt+0x1a/0x20
> [<c0102030>] default_idle+0x0/0x30
> [<c0102053>] default_idle+0x23/0x30
> [<c0102104>] cpu_idle+0x64/0x80
> [<c0462965>] start_kernel+0x185/0x1d0
> [<c0462370>] unknown_bootoption+0x0/0x1e0
> Code: 90 80 3e 00 7e f9 fa eb e8 89 d8 8b 74 24 0c 8b 5c 24 08 83 c4 10 c3 c7 04
> 24 c4 6a 38 c0 8b 44 24 10 89 44 24 04 e8 6d 30 db ff <0f> 0b 95 00 c2 62 38 c0
> eb bc 8d 76 00 53 83 ec 08 89 c3 fa 81
> <0>Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
>
> Regards,
> cvaroqui
>
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 10:11:54AM +0200, Christophe Varoqui wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm testing Mike Christie's START_STOP hwhandler and discovered a bunch of new, interesting, phenomenons :
> >
> > A little context first :
> > o kernel 2.6.12-rc6 + qlogic discovery patch
> > o qla2342 (dual 2GB)
> > o EVA5000, Solaris-tagged connections
> >
> > Here is a map created by multipath, fresh from boot :
> >
> > eva1_lun2 (3600508b400014ba7000120000cf00000)
> > [size=50 GB][features="1 queue_if_no_path"][hwhandler="1 hp_sw"]
> > \_ round-robin 0 [active][best]
> > \_ 0:0:0:2 sdb 8:16 [ready ][active]
> > \_ 1:0:0:2 sdf 8:80 [ready ][active]
> > \_ round-robin 0 [enabled]
> > \_ 0:0:1:2 sdd 8:48 [faulty][active]
> > \_ 1:0:1:2 sdh 8:112 [faulty][active]
> >
> > Start a background stream read with dd on that map.
> >
> > Do a port disable on the FC switch port connected to HBA 0
> > Consistently at this moment I get the following in the logs :
> >
> > qla2300 0000:05:0d.0: LOOP DOWN detected.
> > Debug: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/linux/rwsem.h:43
> > in_atomic():1, irqs_disabled():1
> > [<c0120a74>] __might_sleep+0xa4/0xc0
> > [<c026a466>] device_for_each_child+0x26/0x80
> > [<c02b3180>] target_block+0x0/0x30
> > [<c02bbdae>] fc_remote_port_block+0x2e/0x60
> > [<c02bdbf5>] qla2x00_mark_all_devices_lost+0x55/0x60
> > [<c02c597e>] qla2x00_async_event+0x83e/0xd60
> > [<c011dd2b>] find_busiest_group+0xbb/0x310
> > [<c02cdce4>] sd_rw_intr+0x164/0x320
> > [<c02c4e37>] qla2300_intr_handler+0x77/0x240
> > [<c0144882>] handle_IRQ_event+0x32/0x70
> > [<c0144997>] __do_IRQ+0xd7/0x140
> > [<c0106756>] do_IRQ+0x36/0x70
> > [<c0104c1e>] common_interrupt+0x1a/0x20
> > [<c0102030>] default_idle+0x0/0x30
> > [<c0102053>] default_idle+0x23/0x30
> > [<c0102104>] cpu_idle+0x64/0x80
> >
> > If I wait long enough, I then get the following :
> >
> > rport-0:0-0: blocked FC remote port time out: removing target
> > rport-0:0-1: blocked FC remote port time out: removing target
> >
> > ... which is rather new to me.
> >
> > As a side effect, all sd associated are removed, uevents are sent signaling the disks have gone. This triggers checker removal on multipathd side in the current implementation.
> >
> > Then, upon port reenable, sd are registred again with different minor than before. uevent adds get sent, multipath reconfigures the maps and ...
> >
> > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000
> > printing eip:
> > f8b0d29f
> > *pde = 08e4d001
> > Oops: 0000 [#1]
> > SMP
> > Modules linked in: dm_round_robin dm_hp_sw dm_multipath md5 ipv6 parport_pc lp parport autofs4 i2c_dev i2c_core sunrpc video button battery ac ohci_hcd tg3 floppy dm_mod qla6312
> > CPU: 2
> > EIP: 0060:[<f8b0d29f>] Not tainted VLI
> > EFLAGS: 00010086 (2.6.12-rc6)
> > EIP is at rr_select_path+0xf/0x60 [dm_round_robin]
> > eax: f6a989cc ebx: 00000000 ecx: f6a978c0 edx: f7f1e77c
> > esi: f7f1e77c edi: 00000000 ebp: 00000001 esp: f65d1f00
> > ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
> > Process kmpathd/2 (pid: 4564, threadinfo=f65d0000 task=f6708aa0)
> > Stack: f6a989c0 f7f1e740 f8ae3bc2 f7f1e740 f7f1e740 f8ae3c90 f7f1e740 f7f1e740
> > 00000000 f7f1e74c f8ae3f9c 00000286 00000000 f7f1e754 f7f1e740 f7f34100
> > f7f1e790 00000282 c01339a2 00000000 000f42b4 f6cdfe5c f7f34128 f7f34110
> > Call Trace:
> > [<f8ae3bc2>] __choose_path_in_pg+0x12/0x40 [dm_multipath]
> > [<f8ae3c90>] __choose_pgpath+0xa0/0xb0 [dm_multipath]
> > [<f8ae3f9c>] process_queued_ios+0x7c/0xf0 [dm_multipath]
> > [<c01339a2>] worker_thread+0x1c2/0x250
> > [<f8ae3f20>] process_queued_ios+0x0/0xf0 [dm_multipath]
> > [<c011eaa0>] default_wake_function+0x0/0x10
> > [<c011eaa0>] default_wake_function+0x0/0x10
> > [<c01337e0>] worker_thread+0x0/0x250
> > [<c0137c65>] kthread+0xa5/0xf0
> > [<c0137bc0>] kthread+0x0/0xf0
> > [<c0102445>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0x10
> > Code: 42 04 89 10 89 58 04 89 03 31 c0 5b c3 eb 0d 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 83 ec 08 89 74 24 04 89 d6 89 1c 24 8b 58 04 <8b> 03 39 d8 74 30 89 c1 8b 50 04 8b 00 85 c9 89 50 04 89 02 8b
> >
> > Here dd is now stuck in D-state.
> >
> > I Will post more as I continue my hammering.
> >
> > Regards,
> > cvaroqui
> >
> ----- End forwarded message -----
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-andmike
--
Michael Anderson
andmike@us.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-23 21:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-13 12:30 [Fwd] further testing w/ multipath ... and bugs Christophe Varoqui
2005-06-23 21:05 ` Mike Anderson [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-06-24 14:14 James.Smart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050623210536.GA20141@us.ibm.com \
--to=andmike@us.ibm.com \
--cc=James.Smart@Emulex.Com \
--cc=andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com \
--cc=christophe.varoqui@free.fr \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox