From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com>
Cc: Linux-SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: calling scsi_adjust_queue_depth() during I/O...
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 09:57:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050805075751.GN9369@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050804234155.GJ13374@plap.qlogic.org>
On Thu, Aug 04 2005, Andrew Vasquez wrote:
> All,
>
> While adding support for the new change_queue_depth/type() callbacks,
>
> static int
> qla2x00_change_queue_depth(struct scsi_device *sdev, int qdepth)
> {
> scsi_adjust_queue_depth(sdev, scsi_get_tag_type(sdev), qdepth);
> return sdev->queue_depth;
> }
>
> and updating the queue-depth:
>
> # echo 16 > /sys/class/scsi_device/3:0:0:0/device/queue_depth
>
> while I/O is running, I'm hitting a reproducible WARN_ON() triggering
> within as_completed_request():
>
> static void as_completed_request(request_queue_t *q, struct request *rq)
> {
> struct as_data *ad = q->elevator->elevator_data;
> struct as_rq *arq = RQ_DATA(rq);
>
> WARN_ON(!list_empty(&rq->queuelist));
Tejun, can you take a look at this please?
> ...
>
> and a subsequent panic:
>
> Badness in as_completed_request at drivers/block/as-iosched.c:951
>
> Call Trace: <IRQ> ffff8024883a>{as_completed_request+63} <ffffffff8024098d>{elv_completed_request+44}
> <ffffffff8024272a>{__blk_put_request+73} <ffffffff80280781>{scsi_end_request+164}
> <ffffffff802809eb>{scsi_io_completion+584} <ffffffff80297059>{sd_rw_intr+709}
> <ffffffff8027aa08>{scsi_finish_command+182} <ffffffff8027b2dc>{scsi_softirq+255}
> <ffffffff801291ea>{__do_softirq+110} <ffffffff8010eb13>{call_softirq+31}
> <ffffffff801101be>{do_softirq+54} <ffffffff80110211>{do_IRQ+74}
> <ffffffff8010deba>{ret_from_intr+0} <EOI> <ffffffff8010c2fd>{mwait_idle+86}
> <ffffffff8021aef0>{acpi_processor_idle+310} <ffffffff8010cacb>{cpu_idle+79}
> <ffffffff804cecbf>{start_secondary+1017}
> ----------- [cut here ] --------- [please bite here ] ---------
> Kernel BUG at "drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c":2361
> invalid operand: 0000 [1] SMP
> CPU 2
> Modules linked in: qla2xxx
> Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.13-rc5
> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff80242734>] <ffffffff80242734>{__blk_put_request+83}
> RSP: 0018:ffff8100021bbde8 EFLAGS: 00010087
> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff81002dc738b0 RCX: 0000000000008000
> RDX: 0000000000004e6b RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff81003e091778
> RBP: ffff81003f8fa600 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000003
> R10: 00000000ffffffff R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
> R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff81003f8fa600 R15: ffff81003f8fa600
> FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffffff804b6900(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0018 ES: 0018 CR0: 000000008005003b
> CR2: 00002aaaaaac1000 CR3: 0000000037f05000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
> Process swapper (pid: 0, threadinfo ffff8100021b6000, task ffff8100021b54f0)
> Stack: ffff81002dc738b0 ffff81002c1cd7c0 0000000000000286 ffffffff80280781
> 0000000000000001 ffff81002c1cd7c0 ffff81002dc738b0 0000000000000000
> 0000000000080000 ffffffff802809eb
> Call Trace: <IRQ> <ffffffff80280781>{scsi_end_request+164} <ffffffff802809eb>{scsi_io_completion+584}
> <ffffffff80297059>{sd_rw_intr+709} <ffffffff8027aa08>{scsi_finish_command+182}
> <ffffffff8027b2dc>{scsi_softirq+255} <ffffffff801291ea>{__do_softirq+110}
> <ffffffff8010eb13>{call_softirq+31} <ffffffff801101be>{do_softirq+54}
> <ffffffff80110211>{do_IRQ+74} <ffffffff8010deba>{ret_from_intr+0}
> <EOI> <ffffffff8010c2fd>{mwait_idle+86} <ffffffff8021aef0>{acpi_processor_idle+310}
> <ffffffff8010cacb>{cpu_idle+79} <ffffffff804cecbf>{start_secondary+1017}
>
> Code: 0f 0b a3 0b f2 32 80 ff ff ff ff c2 39 09 48 89 de 48 89 ef
> RIP <ffffffff80242734>{__blk_put_request+83} RSP <ffff8100021bbde8>
> <3>Debug: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/linux/rwsem.h:43
> in_atomic():1, irqs_disabled():1
>
> Call Trace: <IRQ> <ffffffff8011e2d7>{__might_sleep+199} <ffffffff80125316>{profile_task_exit+34}
> <ffffffff80126fe2>{do_exit+34} <ffffffff801fc7d0>{vgacon_cursor+231}
> <ffffffff8010f653>{kernel_math_error+0} <ffffffff8010fa09>{do_trap+264}
> <ffffffff8010feb9>{do_invalid_op+145} <ffffffff80242734>{__blk_put_request+83}
> <ffffffff801245d7>{printk+141} <ffffffff8010e415>{error_exit+0}
> <ffffffff80242734>{__blk_put_request+83} <ffffffff8024272a>{__blk_put_request+73}
> <ffffffff80280781>{scsi_end_request+164} <ffffffff802809eb>{scsi_io_completion+584}
> <ffffffff80297059>{sd_rw_intr+709} <ffffffff8027aa08>{scsi_finish_command+182}
> <ffffffff8027b2dc>{scsi_softirq+255} <ffffffff801291ea>{__do_softirq+110}
> <ffffffff8010eb13>{call_softirq+31} <ffffffff801101be>{do_softirq+54}
> <ffffffff80110211>{do_IRQ+74} <ffffffff8010deba>{ret_from_intr+0}
> <EOI> <ffffffff8010c2fd>{mwait_idle+86} <ffffffff8021aef0>{acpi_processor_idle+310}
> <ffffffff8010cacb>{cpu_idle+79} <ffffffff804cecbf>{start_secondary+1017}
>
> Kernel panic - not syncing: Aiee, killing interrupt handler!
>
> Adding scsi_target_quiesce() and scsi_target_resume() barriers around
> the scsi_adjust_target_queue_depth() call appears to help (i.e.
> dropping from 32 -> 24):
>
> # echo 24 > /sys/class/scsi_device/3\:0\:0\:0/device/queue_depth
>
> and dropping down again to 16:
>
> # echo 16 > /sys/class/scsi_device/3\:0\:0\:0/device/queue_depth
>
> but occasionally, while trying another depth drop:
>
> # echo 10 > /sys/class/scsi_device/3\:0\:0\:0/device/queue_depth
>
> I'll either get a panic (haven't captured a good one yet (only a
> couple of line within the trace):
>
> eip: ffffffff80248a62
> ----------- [cut here ] --------- [please bite here ] ---------
> Kernel BUG at "include/asm/spinlock.h":121
>
> or I get the following slab-error:
>
> slab error in cache_free_debugcheck(): cache `size-128': double free, or memory outside object was overwritten
>
> Call Trace:<ffffffff8014930c>{cache_free_debugcheck+290} <ffffffff8014975c>{kfree+136}
> <ffffffff80244e65>{blk_queue_resize_tags+119} <ffffffff8027a826>{scsi_adjust_queue_depth+68}
> <ffffffff88000133>{:qla2xxx:qla2x00_change_queue_depth+71}
> <ffffffff80283666>{sdev_store_queue_depth_rw+82} <ffffffff8023a9a2>{dev_attr_store+31}
> <ffffffff80191e95>{sysfs_write_file+200} <ffffffff80160dba>{vfs_write+172}
> <ffffffff80160ed8>{sys_write+69} <ffffffff8010d8f6>{system_call+126}
>
> ffff8100389baba8: redzone 1: 0x170fc2a5, redzone 2: 0x0.
>
> I'm using a fairly recent snapshot of Linus' GIT tree (sync done
> earlier today).
>
> Two questions:
>
> - must the target be quiesced before adjusting the queue-depth?
>
> - any ideas on where why successive lowering of the depth borks the
> machine?
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew Vasquez
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-05 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-04 23:41 calling scsi_adjust_queue_depth() during I/O Andrew Vasquez
2005-08-05 7:57 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2005-08-05 11:09 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-05 11:43 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-05 12:33 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-05 15:55 ` Andrew Vasquez
2005-08-05 15:59 ` Jens Axboe
2005-08-05 17:15 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-05 16:32 ` James Bottomley
2005-08-05 17:10 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-05 17:20 ` James Bottomley
2005-08-05 17:24 ` Andrew Vasquez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050805075751.GN9369@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox