From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] minimal SAS transport class Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 18:07:30 +0100 Message-ID: <20050821170730.GA28572@infradead.org> References: <20050819140631.GB12485@lst.de> <43061C3C.2020303@adaptec.com> <20050819175459.GA16619@lst.de> <43061D57.9060201@adaptec.com> <20050819175929.GA5614@infradead.org> <43061FC9.8060301@adaptec.com> <1124481582.5130.88.camel@mulgrave> <430641CF.3070709@adaptec.com> <20050820091814.GB21698@infradead.org> <430769B9.9080302@adaptec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from zeus1.kernel.org ([204.152.191.4]:38093 "EHLO zeus1.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751157AbVHUVlN (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Aug 2005 17:41:13 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org (pentafluge.infradead.org [213.146.154.40]) by zeus1.kernel.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7LHB2oE006987 for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 10:11:02 -0700 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <430769B9.9080302@adaptec.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Luben Tuikov Cc: Christoph Hellwig , James Bottomley , Jeff Garzik , James.Smart@Emulex.Com, ltuikov@yahoo.com, Eric.Moore@lsil.com, andrew.patterson@hp.com, SCSI Mailing List On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 01:34:49PM -0400, Luben Tuikov wrote: > > that even if my minimal code goes in now there's absolutely no reason > > we can't replace it completely later on. See the evolution of the FC > > transport class. > > Who makes all those decisions? In the end James, unless he'd be over-ruled by Linus (which is rather unlikely) > More generally, why is SCSI Core not being managed by > Documentation/ManagingStyle? It is. > Is it because there's so much vendor interest here? There's about as much vendor interest as elsewhere.